Heroes:
May 28, 2007Congressman Ron Paul now has twice as many YouTube subscribers as all of the other Republican candidates for president combined. Here are the numbersPaul - 12,103Romney - 2,059/
Giuliani - 1,429/
McCain - 1,291/
Hunter - 413/
Huckabee - 342/
Tancredo - 211/
Brownback - 111/
Gilmore - 60/
Thompson - 0/
Total - 5,916Congressman Paul also has twice as many YouTube subscribers as Barack Obama who has 5,988, and nearly four times as many as Hillary Clinton who has 3,517 subscribers.Ron Paul 2008 YouTube Channel
..start--
Military Leaders Question 9/11
George
Washington's Blog
Thursday April 19, 2007
Numerous high-level U.S. military leaders have publicly questioned
9/11. The following is just a small sample*:
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan
said that the
official story of 9/11 is "the dog that doesn't hunt" (if you
suspect he is a closet liberal, take
a look at his bio )
Director of the U.S. "Star Wars" space defense program in both Republican
and Democratic administrations, who was a senior air force colonel
who flew 101 combat missions, stated that
9/11 was an inside job (he also said "If
our government had merely done nothing, and allowed normal procedures
to happen on that morning of 9/11, the twin towers would still be
standing, and thousands of dead Americans would still be alive.
[T]hat is treason" )
U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director, decorated
with the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal stated
that
"there is no way that an aircraft . . . would not be intercepted
when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders,
or stop communication with Air Traffic Control ... Attempts to obscure
facts by calling them a 'conspiracy Theory' does not change the
truth. It seems, 'Something is rotten in the State.'"
President of the U.S. Air Force Accident Investigation Board, who
also served as Pentagon Weapons Requirement Officer and as a member
of the Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review, and who was awarded
Distinguished Flying Crosses for Heroism, four Air Medals, four
Meritorious Service Medals, and nine Aerial Achievement Medals,
is a member of a group which doubts
the government's version of 9/11
20-year
Marine Corps infantry and intelligence officer, the second-ranking
civilian in U.S. Marine Corps Intelligence, and former CIA clandestine
services case officer stated that "9/11
was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war" , and
it was probably an inside job (see Customer Review dated October
7, 2006).
U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme
Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze
Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart said "We've
never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration
actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence
seems pretty clear to me. I've seen that for a long time."
Air Force Colonel and key Pentagon official finds
various aspects of 9/11 suspicious
Lieutenant colonel, 24-year Air Force career, Vice Chancellor for
Student Affairs at the Defense Language Institute said "Of
course Bush knew about the impending attacks on America. He did
nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on
terrorism."
Two-Star general questions
the attack on the Pentagon
U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former instructor at the USAF Fighter
Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program, with a 20-year
Air Force career
said the following :
"I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11,
2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators
that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government ....
Those of us in the military took an oath to "support and defend
the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign
and domestic". Just because we have retired does not make that oath
invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to
expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice,
no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have
to suffer to do it.
We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same
oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right
now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed
orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation
and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the
most accurate definition of treason!"
U.S. Marine Corps lieutenant colonel, a fighter pilot with over 300
combat missions flown and a 21-year Marine Corps career, believes
that 9/11 was an inside job, and said :
"This
isn't about party, it isn't about Bush Bashing. It's about our country,
our constitution, and our future. ...
Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it
the more it looks as though they were murdered by our government,
who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles
away.
If you ridicule others who have sincere doubts and who know factual
information that directly contradicts the official report and who
want explanations from those who hold the keys to our government,
and have motive, means, and opportunity to pull off a 9/11, but
you are too lazy or fearful, or ... to check into the facts yourself,
what does that make you? ....
Are you afraid that you will learn the truth and you can't handle
it? ..."
Former army captain and intelligence officer
said this :
"As a former Army officer, my tendency
immediately after 911 was to rally 'round the colors and defend
the country against what I then thought was an insidious, malicious
all-Arab entity called Al-Qaida. In fact, in April of 2002, I attempted
to reactivate my then-retired commission to return to serve my country
in its time of peril...
Now I view the 911 event . . . as a matter that implies either
A) passive participation by the Bush White House through a deliberate
stand-down of proper defense procedures that (if followed) would
have led US air assets to a quick identification and confrontation
of the passenger aircraft that impacted WTC 1 and WTC 2, or worse
...
B) active execution of a plot by rogue elements of government, starting
with the White House itself, in creating a spectacle of destruction
that would lead the United States into an invasion of the Middle
East ..."
Additionally, numerous military leaders from allied governments have
questioned 9/11, such as:
Canadian
Minister of Defense (the top military leader of Canada)
Assistant
German Defense Minister (the number two military leader from Germany)
The
chief of NATO, a h igh-ranking
general (regarding
bombs in the Twin Towers; in Danish)
Commander-in-chief
of the Russian Air Force
Chief
of staff of the Russian armed forces
In addition to the numerous military leaders who question 9/11, hundreds
of high-level government officials, such as senators and congressmen,
the head of the FBI and other high-level intelligence officers, the
presidents of allied governments, U.S. government scientists, terrorism
experts, legal experts and even 9/11 Commissioners question 9/11.
See this web
page and the top of this
webpage .
* Unless otherwise noted, the persons cited are retired.
..end--
Parental Consent Act of 2007 (Introduced in House)HR 2387 IH
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. R. 2387
To prohibit the use of Federal funds for any universal or mandatory mental health screening program.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 17, 2007
Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. EVERETT, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. TANCREDO, and Mr. DOOLITTLE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL
To prohibit the use of Federal funds for any universal or mandatory mental health screening program.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Parental Consent Act of 2007'.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
The Congress finds as follows:
(1) The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issued findings and recommendations against screening for suicide that corroborate those of the Canadian Preventive Services Task Force. `USPSTF found no evidence that screening for suicide risk reduces suicide attempts or mortality. There is limited evidence on the accuracy of screening tools to identify suicide risk in the primary care setting, including tools to identify those at high risk.'.
(2) The 1999 Surgeon General's report on mental health admitted the serious conflicts in the medical literature regarding the definitions of mental health and mental illness when it said, `In other words, what it means to be mentally healthy is subject to many different interpretations that are rooted in value judgments that may vary across cultures. The challenge of defining mental health has stalled the development of programs to foster mental health (Secker, 1998). . . .'.
(3) A 2005 report by the National Center for Infant and Early Childhood Health Policy admitted, with respect to the psychiatric screening of children from birth to age 5, the following: `We have mentioned a number of the problems for the new field of IMH [Infant Mental Health] throughout this paper, and many of them complicate examining outcomes.'. Briefly, such problems include:
(B) Lack of agreement about diagnosis.
(C) Criteria for referrals or acceptance into services are not always well defined.
(D) Lack of longitudinal outcome studies.
(E) Appropriate assessment and treatment requires multiple informants involved with the young child: parents, clinicians, child care staff, preschool staff, medical personnel, and other service providers.
(F) Broad parameters for determining socioemotional outcomes are not clearly defined, although much attention is now being given to school readiness.
(4) Authors of the bible of psychiatric diagnosis, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, admit that the diagnostic criteria for mental illness are vague, saying, `DSM-IV criteria remain a consensus without clear empirical data supporting the number of items required for the diagnosis. . . . Furthermore, the behavioral characteristics specified in DSM-IV, despite efforts to standardize them, remain subjective. . . .' (American Psychiatric Association Committee on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV 1994), pp. 1162-1163).
(5) Because of the subjectivity of psychiatric diagnosis, it is all too easy for a psychiatrist to label a person's disagreement with the psychiatrist's political beliefs a mental disorder.
(6) Efforts are underway to add a diagnosis of `extreme intolerance' to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. Prisoners in the California State penal system judged to have this extreme intolerance based on race or sexual orientation are considered to be delusional and are being medicated with anti-psychotic drugs. (Washington Post 12/10/05)
(7) At least one federally-funded school violence prevention program has suggested that a child who shares his or her parent's traditional values may be likely to instigate school violence.
(8) Despite many statements in the popular press and by groups promoting the psychiatric labeling and medication of children, that ADD/ADHD is due to a chemical imbalance in the brain, the 1998 National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference said, `. . . further research is necessary to firmly establish ADHD as a brain disorder. This is not unique to ADHD, but applies as well to most psychiatric disorders, including disabling diseases such as schizophrenia. . . . Although an independent diagnostic test for ADHD does not exist. . . . Finally, after years of clinical research and experience with ADHD, our knowledge about the cause or causes of ADHD remains speculative.'.
(9) There has been a precipitous increase in the prescription rates of psychiatric drugs in children:
(A) The use of antipsychotic medication in children has increased nearly fivefold between 1995 and 2002 with more than 2.5 million children receiving these medications, the youngest being 18 months old. (Vanderbilt University, 2006)
(B) More than 2.2 million children are receiving more than one psychotropic drug at one time with no scientific evidence of safety or effectiveness. (Medco Health Solutions, 2006)
(C) More money was spent on psychiatric drugs for children than on antibiotics or asthma medication in 2003. (Medco Trends, 2004)
(10) A September 2004 Food and Drug Administration hearing found that more than two-thirds of studies of antidepressants given to depressed children showed that they were no more effective than placebo, or sugar pills, and that only the positive trials were published by the pharmaceutical industry. The lack of effectiveness of antidepressants has been known by the Food and Drug Administration since at least 2000 when, according to the Food and Drug Administration Background Comments on Pediatric Depression, Robert Temple of the Food and Drug Administration Office of Drug Evaluation acknowledged the `preponderance of negative studies of antidepressants in pediatric populations'. The Surgeon General's report said of stimulant medication like Ritalin, `However, psychostimulants do not appear to achieve long-term changes in outcomes such as peer relationships, social or academic skills, or school achievement.'.
(11) The Food and Drug Administration finally acknowledged by issuing its most severe Black Box Warnings in September 2004, that the newer antidepressants are related to suicidal thoughts and actions in children and that this data was hidden for years. A confirmatory review of that data published in 2006 by Columbia University's department of psychiatry, which is also the originator of the TeenScreen instrument, found that `in children and adolescents (aged 6-18 years), antidepressant drug treatment was significantly associated with suicide attempts . . . and suicide deaths. . . . '. The Food and Drug Administration had over 2000 reports of completed suicides from 1987 to 1995 for the drug Prozac alone, which by the agency's own calculations represent but a fraction of the suicides. Prozac is the only such drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in children.
(12) Other possible side effects of psychiatric medication used in children include mania, violence, dependence, weight gain, and insomnia from the newer antidepressants; cardiac toxicity including lethal arrhythmias from the older antidepressants; growth suppression, psychosis, and violence from stimulants; and diabetes from the newer anti-psychotic medications.
(13) Parents are already being coerced to put their children on psychiatric medications and some children are dying because of it. Universal or mandatory mental health screening and the accompanying treatments recommended by the President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health will only increase that problem. Across the country, Patricia Weathers, the Carroll Family, the Johnston Family, and the Salazar Family were all charged or threatened with child abuse charges for refusing or taking their children off of psychiatric medications.
(14) The United States Supreme Court in Pierce versus Society of Sisters (268 U.S. 510 (1925)) held that parents have a right to direct the education and upbringing of their children.
(15) Universal or mandatory mental health screening violates the right of parents to direct and control the upbringing of their children.
(16) Federal funds should never be used to support programs that could lead to the increased over-medication of children, the stigmatization of children and adults as mentally disturbed based on their political or other beliefs, or the violation of the liberty and privacy of Americans by subjecting them to invasive `mental health screening' (the results of which are placed in medical records which are available to government officials and special interests without the patient's consent).
SEC. 3. PROHIBITION AGAINST FEDERAL FUNDING OF UNIVERSAL OR MANDATORY MENTAL HEALTH SCREENING.
(a) Universal or Mandatory Mental Health Screening Program- No Federal funds may be used to establish or implement any universal or mandatory mental health, psychiatric, or socioemotional screening program.
(b) Refusal to Consent as Basis of a Charge of Child Abuse or Education Neglect- No Federal education funds may be paid to any local educational agency or other instrument of government that uses the refusal of a parent or legal guardian to provide express, written, voluntary, informed consent to mental health screening for his or her child as the basis of a charge of child abuse, child neglect, medical neglect, or education neglect until the agency or instrument demonstrates that it is no longer using such refusal as a basis of such a charge.
(c) Definition- For purposes of this Act, the term `universal or mandatory mental health, psychiatric, or socioemotional screening program'--
(1) means any mental health screening program in which a set of individuals (other than members of the Armed Forces or individuals serving a sentence resulting from conviction for a criminal offense) is automatically screened without regard to whether there was a prior indication of a need for mental health treatment; and
(A) any program of State incentive grants for transformation to implement recommendations in the July 2003 report of the President's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, the State Early Childhood Comprehensive System, grants for TeenScreen, and the Foundations for Learning Grants; and
(B) any student mental health screening program that allows mental health screening of individuals under 18 years of age without the express, written, voluntary, informed consent of the parent or legal guardian of the individual involved.
