A VICTIM FIRST SCREAM IS FOR HELP,
A VICTIM SECOND SCREAM IS FOR JUSTICE!!!!!
Fighting Child Protective Services False Accusations
Our Government should fear the People, not the People FEAR our GOVERNMENT!!NO ONE SHOULD RATION JUSTICE~ Please read Past Blogs above~
While living in West virgnia, My ex husband Robert Perez discovered corruption in the Family Court System and when he " voiced " a concern about it , The Court itself " RETALITATED " agasint him exageratting an abuse and neglect case in Retalitaion to a Federal Complaint that he filed.. The children SUFFERED becasue of the acts of the " Prudent Proffestionals" that abused the Ethics of their Proffessions to harrass him in their own Jurisdiction and the CHILDREN SUFFERED.. and are still suffering as a result. !!! and
,
CPS and the prosecuting Attorney Filed A Complaint that Exagerated Untrue Elements That They knew were False To Enhance a petitition To fall within the INTENT OF THE LAW FOR ABUSE and NEGLECT To have Jourisdiction . Now
my children are becoming a statistic and victimized by the system. Is there
hope for me and my children, or is the judge going to take my rights away so
that the fight can continue in another court, the supreme court? The courts
have taken my God given parental rights away from be in an attempt to rid
themselves of Mr. PXXX. This is not justice. It is cowardice." If we are to keep our Democracy , there must be one commandment..thou
shall not ration Justice" ...... Judge Learned Hand~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Like to know who this JUSTICE person is. Can I meet them?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
zerocool9m sexy never left here (READY)
Date: Dec 24, 2007 4:11 PM
Check out this video: Rev. Ron Smith: Family Justice
..
Add to My Profile | More Videos
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/986173347
GOAL is to EXPLOIT this BARBARIC MADNESS called CPS!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~http://www.akidsright.org/shame.
htm HALL OF SHAME go ahead and CLICK CLICK~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Forcibly taking a mother's children, and then controlling her emotionally by withholding contact must be publicly recognized as one of the greatest forms of "mis-use" of the American justice system and one of the greatest hidden vehicles for wide-spread socially approved physical and emotional abuse and control."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mommy says the "injustice" committed against her is not only the physical separation from her children, but the willful desecration of the mother-child relationship and bond, "A sacred spiritual and emotional entity."Taking children from their mother is abuse in itself, she says, giving the advantage once again to the abuser. That mean man her Ex Husband aka VAMPIRES ~
Psychopath and Narcissist Survivors Support Group :: View topic - Court~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PLEASE HELP MY MOMMY HELP ME ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Summary of Public Law 105-89 - A summary of the Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997. This law intensifies the war on families to the breaking point. Now the country has made a high-stakes money game out of increasing the number of children adopted out of state care. The results are that more children are being detained on more trivial charges, and termination of parental rights (TPR) can occur after only 15 months of state custody. This is an affront to the human spirit and to the God-given Parent-Child bond. Read it and weep.--
Wiggles Sound Track
My Mommy has done all she can to be cooperative with CPS and they still wont let me come home or even go to my Aunties House!CPS has NOT followed their own STATE POLICY or FEDERAL POLICY at all NOTHING!. as if they are GOD???? They wont do anything to reunify me and my brother with our Mommy!!
Mommy has NO CHARGES ON HER! below Me & Mommy
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Psychological Best Interests of the Child
The "best interest of the child" is the central principle in legal disputes concerning the placement of children. Since the concept is invoked in both law and mental health, it is often viewed as meaning the same to both professions. This idea is false. Psychologically, the determination of best interest depends on the emotional life of the child, especially present and future intimate relationships. Legally, best interests include moral, financial, and multiple other factors in addition to psychological aspects. Moreover, mental health professionals tactly consider best interests as the ultimate principle in placement whereas the law considers other principles to be prior to best interest (e.g., equal protection of parents or society's needs). Opinion of mental health workers is limited to psychological considerations, which are not decisive in determining the legal best interests of the child.Contributors: Glenn Miller MD, Clinical Professor, Psychiatry, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC,The COURTS in WV are sacrificing my children and my GOD GIVEN PARENTAL RIGHTS in order to get rid of one Devil by the last name of PXXX..~~~
This isnt Justice...
This is Cowardlism.... ENTIRELY!
THE STORIES OF THE ORPHAN TRAIN RIDERS
http://www.orphantrainriders.com/riders11.html
WIGGLES! and TELETUBBIES!
My First Visit with My Mommy after 3 months ~~
At first, I was hesitant to see Sean for fear of breaking down when it came
time to leave, but my doctor concluded that I have should go because sooner
or later, I will have to face the uncertainty.
When I arrived, I waited few minutes, and T--- popped her head out
of a doorway and motion for someone waiting for her. She saw me and
gestured to me " you doing ok?" I told her I'm maintaining. She didn't
say this across the lobby, but rather she motioned it with only her lips.When I walked in the room, I did not recognized Sean at first. Two woman
were there and they left with another child. A CPS worker named Nick stayed
to supervise the visit. Immediately he asked me to sign a paper without me
even taking the time to read it, which I didn’t dare do seeing how I was
there to see Sean. After signing the paper I asked the guy to run me a
copy. It turns out that I was signing the rules for visitation, which in
itself, was demeaning. I can’t help but to believe that I will be harshly
judged for asking for a copy of the rules and for protecting my rights.
I sat down with the items I brought for Sean. I didn't know what to say
until I knew that he knew who I was. He looked at me twice and kept
playing with the toy in his had. He looked again then looked around and I
said, “Sean-Don who am I?†He said MAMA...then ran to me and he laid his
head on my shoulder! It was so darling and pitiful all at the same time for
when he looked around, he looked as if he needed an OK from someone. You
know why? Because my doll baby doesn’t trust anyone. Can you blame him?He said " where you be"... then he said " wanna go?" I just kept saying
mommy is in school baby. He got down and opened up the bag I brought,
walked around for a millisecond with his M&M's then stopped, looked back at
me, and RAN BACK TO ME! I started to do his notorious flips we always have
done where I flip him over and over. He was completely thrilled. I said,
“where we sit?†Over and over and played moving my feet a little at a time
and he laughed that laughed. Oh my God! I will treasure that few minutes of
joy with my little angel. He and I had an AMAZING TIME!
He is tiny though. He is in the same 18 months pants that I sent. He is
skinny and his nails were disgusting! His nose was horrible and I asked for
a tissue. The worker said they had none! I asked for the diaper bag and he
showed me a DORA PINK BAG and I said, “Is this Sean’s? He said yes. I left
it at that.Sean wouldn't let me sit down. He wouldn't let me stop this or that. He
was saying " here.. here".. with all the toys. He was showing me how to
work the puzzle I brought him! He talked and talked and did that thing we
do when I asked him, "Sean can you do the baby thing?†And he did! He went
“baby, baby, MMMMM, baby baby, MMMM." ...you know from that movie “Are We
There Yet?†Sean kept kissing me with pursed in lips, verses the pucker way
to kiss. The guy witnessed all of this.
At the end of the visit the guy tells me it is time. I didn’t know how to
say goodbye to Sean. Sean was not crying but more like in a state of shock.
He just looked and stared at me. He wouldn't stop staring at me. He
turned around to this complete stranger and REACHED UP FOR HIM TO PICK HIM
UP. Before he did that, I of course loved on him and he said again, " Wanna
go? Where car?" I said Mommy doesn’t have a car silly willy."The guy let Sean watch me walk down that damn hallway that felt like it was
10 miles long. I looked back and he was still there holding Sean. Sean
didn't wave goodbye. The guy waved for him.Sean is not good. He is so puzzled and confused. He is so small compared
to when I last saw him. Linda thought he was solid from last time she saw
him, but that was summer. He isn’t solid, he is TINY. In fact, he looks
smaller than before. His nails were HORRIBLE black and brown. I didn't say
anything about it though.
I don’t know how I feel right now, but I want to cry and die. I have never
in my life felt like such a failure until I looked into Sean's eyes. He is
a victim of this hell. With Robbie, we all know what I’ve have done. How
I’ve cried and begged for things to end with Robert. Robbie has felt this
ongoing nightmare. With Sean, it is so hard to explain.I cant find the right words yet. The words to explain how I feel after
seeing Sean reach up to that guy who he didn't know. It was horrible from a
mothers point of view. To make matters worse, I ask this person if He had
children and he said no. And I was thinking, then who are you to judge me
with mine? I didn't say it, I just thought it. Barbaric is the only true
word to describe how CPS and the courts have handled this case. The WV
courts used CPS to cover themselves and now CPS is doing what they
themselves are notorious for...making your heart bleed every beat.
This isn’t how it is suppose to happen. All I have ever wanted to do is to
get away from Mr.PXXX abuse and control. Something along the way went
horrible wrong. I will take blame for some of the problems, but the courts
and CPS have exacerbated an already troubled emotional state for Robbie, and
brought one on for Sean. They have also given MrPXXX what he has always
wanted. To make me suffer!!!Now...what can we do to release my children?
WIGGLES AND TELETUBBIES
Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter." (Martin Luther King,Jr.)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
THOMAS THE TANK ENGINE
Goodnight Moon
MY BROTHER ROBBIE!
Graphics & Layouts
The 'Blind Faith in the Bureaucracy' test, [or not!] QuestionnaireIf you answer no to all most all of these questions please write to Judge Horner and tell him so, at: [email protected] you answer yes to these questions: You have no sense of freedom and are not Fully Advised as to your Inalienable Rights. But, there is a couple acceptations bellow which should be answered, "Yes".Can you find which ones?1. DHS 'adjudication', [disposition of a completed assessment], is equivalent to a 'court order'.a. Yes ___ No ___.2. DHS can try you on the spot and that is seen as reasonable efforts, on their part, if you do not do what they say.a. Yes ___ No ___.3. DHS can cite a judge on an unproved matter to build another case against a parent.a. Yes ___ No ___.4. DHS will wait to bring you to trial, with the case they choose to cite, though never proved.a. Yes ___ No ___.5. DHS 'findings', from an assessment are final, and a trial after DHS reports have already taken effect, is not DOUBLE JEOPARDY.a. Yes ___ No ___.6. DHS do not have the obligation of PRESENTMENT, for something never proved.a. Yes ___ No ___.7. DHS can build another case against you even if they never proved the previous matter.a. Yes ___ No ___.8. DHS can gain a continuance (x2), prior to another continuance (x2), while they
determine what their diagnosis is.a. Yes ___ No ___.9. DHS can cite a judge, build another case thereto, before the cited case is proved or investigated.a. Yes ___ No ___.10. A judge can keep you from visiting your children while a case is closed, on the case DHS choose to cite.a. Yes ___ No ___.11. DHS does not have to PRESENT a case prior to taking your other child, while a judge waits to hear from them.a. Yes ___ No ___.12. DHS can try you on the spot at the Juvenile Department, without a proper
'SUMMON'.a. Yes ___ No ___.13. DHS can 'appear' in person, anywhere, any time, not tell you they are coming, and their presence is equivalent to a trial.a. Yes ___ No ___.14. DHS can try a case, by assessment, and then advise the judiciary of their 'findings'.a. Yes ___ No ___.15. DHS findings are final, though the burden of proof is not met beyond a reasonable doubt.a. Yes ___ No ___.16. DHS can take your children basing their 'findings' on statistics alone, till they take you to court for something never proved, not having been subject to proper
PRESENTMENT when required.a. Yes ___ No ___.17. The court can ignore Pro-se attempts to gain discovery, {PRESENTMENT}, because a citizen is not familiar with the legal process.a. Yes ___ No ___.18. The court can ignore Pro-se inadvertence, grounds for an order to dismiss, defined in RULE 71, and give you a 'broken arm'. See: Judge Luukinen, who does not speak English ‘in’ the courtroom.a. Yes ___ No ___.19. There is no acquittal for ‘non’criminal matters.a. Yes ___ No ___.20. There is no plea available in ‘non’criminal matters.a. Yes ___ No ___.21. There is no plea bargain available in ‘non’criminal matters, when a person is said to be suffering of poor mental health, and no protection of Substantive Due Process,
because no crime has been committed.a. Yes ___ No ___.22. The opposing party does not have to cause the DHS to come to court in a ‘non’criminal matter.a. Yes ____ No ___.23. The DHS, the 'voice' of the '..:NAMESPACE PREFIX = ST1 /WHOLE VILLAGE' is not subject to cross examination.a. Yes ___ No ___.24. Police men do not have to come to court for cross examination of the facts when a police report is presented to a judge.a. Yes ___ No ___.25. If you lose your turn, by 'ORDER' of the court, not allowed to place further evidence into record, you are responsible to cause the DHS to speak on your behalf, though they are the opposing parties advocate.a. Yes ___ No ___.26. The court does not have to appoint you Counsel, until after accepting DHS reports, taken before you are advised.a. Yes ___ No ___.27. DHS does not have to Fully Advise you of the nature of their questioning process though their ‘findings’ bear the weight of an ‘adjudication’.a. Yes ___ No ___.28. The 'voice' of the 'WHOLE VILLAGE', ‘DHS case working staff’, is not the
equivalent of the voice of ‘We the People’ of the United States of America, the duties represented as THE BEST INTERESTS OF JUSTICE, the ‘voice’ of the DA.a. Yes ___ No ___.29. The ORS Advocacy, DHS case worker is not required to have a law degree.a. Yes ___ No ___.30. The DHS do not answer to the Oregon State Bar, or subject to be investigated by the Municipal Police.a. Yes ___ No ___.31. If you disagree with DHS staff you have to talk to DHS supervisory staff and use their forms.a. Yes ___ No ___.32. If you do not use DHS forms to resolve a dispute you do not get to submit a
grievance.a. Yes ___ No ___.33. DHS does not have to tell you what the grievance process is or give you Advise on how to complain about their conduct or mistakes.a. Yes ___ No ___.34. DHS is not responsible to respond to an 'ORDER' of the court, who waited to hear from them, which falls to the responsibility of the petitioning party.a. Yes ___ No ___.35. DHS can, after a case is closed, with no further contact with a subject, change the disposition to 'FOUNDED'.a. Yes ___ No ___.36. DHS can interfere with visitation, on a closed case, by threatening to remove a child from the parent who has physical custody, against a child's right to maintain a bond with the other parent.a. Yes ___ No ___.37. A judge can interfere with visitation on a closed case, against the right to a speedy trial, while the DHS wait for grounds to open a closed case, while advancing their assessment 'findings' of UNABLE TO DETERMINE.a. Yes ___ No ___.38. DHS can act as though they proved a case on insufficient evidence, [no reasonable cause to believe neglect or abuse has occurred], and 'found', at a later date, the disposition UNABLE TO DETERMINE as a 'FOUNDED' case with no doctor reports.a. Yes ___ No ___.39. Statistics will replace a sound police investigation and doctor reports until a set of double continuances provide time for DHS diagnosis.a. Yes ___ No ___.40. DHS can interfere with visitation for matters they do not investigate before or after they assess your parenting.a. Yes ___ No ___.41. The burden of proof is not on the DHS by a direct examination of doctor reports they never ordered to see.a. Yes ___ No ___.42. DHS can at any time, regarding the report of medical neglect, order a release of
information into doctor patient privilege and ignore the initial allegation.a. Yes ___ No ___.43. DHS can forward their clinical diagnosis, without direct examination of an intended client, in lieu of a release thereto, when that person does not want to be their client, SAY they represent the child, BEST INTERESTS, and the parent, too.a. Yes ___ No ___.44. DHS can represent child and parent, by way of parents Social Security Number, as their intended clients, though they have no license to practice law, as Counsel of
Choice, and have no Professional Rules of Conduct which includes privilege.a. Yes ___ No ___.45. Though a law firm cannot, when there is a conflict of interest, represent both parent and the intended complainant, the DHS case worker can, complainant being the child, requiring the complainee, the parent, cooperate and allow access to all their private information and witnesses, though the DHS is the opposing party.a. Yes ___ No ___.46. The DHS does not have to press a criminal allegation in order to subject you to
'ADMINISTRATIVE' LAW and there is no plea available or acquittal, because
'ADMINISTRATIVE LAW' is not the criminal justice system subject to definitions
thereto.a. Yes ___ No ___.47. DHS can press obstruction charges where there is no plea, where the rules of evidence do not apply, if you do not sign a release of information, when you have no lawyer to guard against prejudice.a. Yes ___ No ___.48. DHS can punish you with criminal prosecution by way of obstruction charges if you do not participate with 'ADMINISTRATION' over a non’crime, and you have no lawyer, and they do not tell you why they are threatening to kick in your door.a. Yes ___ No ___.49. It is reasonable for the DHS to say, “The case is closed we are not answering your lettersâ€, but “We intend to take you to court someday and prevent you from visiting your children in the meantimeâ€.a. Yes ___ No ___.50. It is reasonable for the DHS to allege possible inferences towards child abuse or
neglect not provide you a lawyer while assessing, and decide relevancy issues over
something they stated has no reasonable cause to believe child abuse or neglect
occurred.a. Yes ___ No ___.51. It is reasonable for a judge to deny PRESENTMENT prior to a trial, then order
PRESENTMENT continuing a proceeding, after inferences toward child abuse or
neglect resulted in a closed case.a. Yes ___ No ___.52. It is just that the DHS make decisions, that affect you longer that any felonious act would, and you have to provide your own lawyer, at your own expense, if you
disagree with their opinion.a. Yes ___ No ___.53. DHS should represent your doctor, your child, you, though that is a conflict of
interest, and a judge should not provide you a lawyer when his 'ORDER' is DHS
come to his court room.a. Yes ___ No ___.54. DHS can represent both parent and child, even when there is not enough evidence to substantiate an allegation.a. Yes ___ No ___.55. Complaining about DHS staff is to be seen as obsessive and compulsive disorder and you should be brought to court in chains if the judge does not agree to allow a MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC TESTIMONY.a. Yes ___ No ___.56. The DHS should only respond to half a report, then say, "UNABLE TO
DETERMINE", though there is no evidence the caller, (who logged the report), was
concerned enough to step in at any specific date, while saying 'the long-drawn-out
emergency’, they never personally attended to, is ongoing, RIGHT NOW, and wishes to remain anonymous.a. Yes ___ No ___.57. The DHS should act against your parental rights, after they decided not to, close the case, because of the lack of evidence, and the January 10, 2005 caller was not believed by the DHS.a. Yes ___ No ___.58. The contradictions in logic should outweigh the lack of proof and DHS should act as though you are committing a felony, since my sentence has been extended for now almost a year, because I said, “Get a SEARCH WARRANT from a real judge, and maintain the right to privacy, not wanting to include DHS in your privileged
relationships.a. Yes ___ No ___.59. A caller should remain anonymous, though purporting to have intimate knowledge regarding your state of mind, and the severity of abuse they purport, saying the younger of the children is in a state of emergency, and the older is on drugs.a. Yes ___ No ___.60. A material witness should remain anonymous and the judge should appoint public officials, probation officers, and CASA, as witnesses in lieu of first hand attestation, in open court, form a caller who claims to be an inside witness.a. Yes ____ No ___.61. DHS should require all parents, who of sound mind, to submit their medical
evaluations and decisions, subject to a detailed release thereto, to a State Case Worker, as law, so the DHS do not have to pick and choose selecting who they require to submit to an evaluation.a. Yes ___ No ___.62. DHS should know immediately when a parent begins seeing a psychiatrist, be allowed to declare an emergency, if they need assistance in determining what you psychiatrist has to say regarding your medical choices, while under his care.a. Yes ___ No ___.63. DHS provides a Social Service, not to be confused as Social Duress, if they do not allow you to make your own medical choices, once you begin psychiatric treatments.a. Yes ___ No ___.64. A Child Abuse Hotline Screener should be switched, after another closed the case at screening, when DHS supervisory staff calls to provide "NEW INFORMATION", and not presenting that information to you first, as law stipulates they should do.a. Yes ___ No ___.65. If the caller at the time of the report, stipulated directly that they had direct knowledge regarding an ‘ongoing’ matter, and do not reported ongoing involvement, like; calling an ambulance, baby sitting, meal preparation, as including in their report: what assistance was given to the child, the report should be believed as if it were true, though DHS took no action for almost a month.a. Yes ___ No ___.66. The DHS should close a case just as they claim and emergency is ongoing, though they did not document that they recognized it before, during the assessment, and annotate after the fact.a. Yes ___ No ___.67. I should not be troubled by the tangible effect of this type of action happening to the rest of the people of this nation, if a third trial were held.a. Yes ___ No ___.68. It is always proper to try a DHS case, under an 'ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE', and then have a jury determine if a judge made the right choice while they re-try the case after a parent refuses to do what the DHS say.a. Yes ___ No ___.69. DHS 'findings' is not to be seen by Americans as Pre-Adjudication, though judges follow their recommendations.a. Yes ___ No ___.70. The morals of the Declaration of Independence allow for a judge to have advisors who not come to court for cross examination, where there is no jury, on matters that affect you the rest of your life.a. Yes ___ No ___.71. An eighteen year old should not be given the right not to contract with an agency by a judicial 'ORDER'.a. Yes ____ No ___.72. An eleven year old who says, "Yes, but, nothing that worries me", and nothing further to the question, "Does your mother do anything weird?", have words that should be construed as a complaint even after he says, "No", to the question, "Do you want to go live with your dad?".a. Yes ____ No ___.If you know what questions to say yes to, please send me a letter. All these questions are based on the actual events and are a sign of lawlessness. My government should not be both above, while acting below, the law.This F:..Confirmation of Judicial Opinion.doc The 'Blind Faith in the Bureaucracy' test, [or not!] Questionnaire was addredded to Dear Public officials, political leaders, and news media personnel;