Thanks for the pic Paul
For all my American friends...
ImpeachingBush and Cheney!
Read this blog at Peace Now
**Click on the banner below to join the list**
General Election 2007!
Sign the Petition NOW!
Home Page: www.tiltingatwindmills.org.uk
Blogs: blog.tiltingatwindmills.org.uk
MySpace blog
Interactive: tawnews.org.uk
Mailing List & eGroup:
TawNews @ Yahoo Groups
We're also at NewsVine and SiteSpaces
Photos: A few sample pics here at MySpace or check out our Flickr PhotoAlbum
Boris Johnson MP on ID Cards...
Ok, so he might be a member of the evil Conservative Party, but he's a damn sight better bet than the current crop of pretenders!
Thanks for the badge Charlie !
9/11 and stuff...
It seems that the deeper one delves into the 9/11 affair the more it all becomes as "smoke and mirrors" - whilst walking on quicksand! If there could be any greater testament to the probability that this outrage is a real can of worms I don't know what it could be. Nor do I know of any greater incentive to try to get to the bottom of it all. This opening remark has been prompted by the following "update"...
UPDATE:
The CIA's Internet Fakes
The authors of the above page (on breakfornews.com ) allege that many of the people and websites involved in the "9/11 Truth" movement are in fact, in one form or another, "fronts" for the CIA - seeking to spread disinformation and undermine legitimate attempts to uncover the real facts behind the Twin Towers attacks etc.
It has to be observed that breakfornews.com could itself be a disinfo operation intended to discredit the contributions being made by some of the front-runners in the "9/11 Truth" movement.
Ultimately, you'll have to make up your own mind. All I would say is, look at the facts that are known - the events preceding 9/11; the witness testimonies; the science; the credibility of the U.S. administration; then use your common sense and seek to come to your own conclusions.
However, I have to observe that within the "9/11 Truth" movement one can find many outlandish claims, theories, and "explanations" which, in my view, do very little to help the cause and may indeed be counter-productive. So I urge you to exercise some caution in a) accepting unquestioningly everything you read, and b) avoid dismissing the central question ("Was 9/11 an inside job?" - or perhaps more accurately "Is the official version wrong?") just because the issue has become tainted with some extreme ideas.
This is not to be inferred as a comment upon the validity or veracity of such ideas but a suggestion that the safest ground to focus upon is that dealing with the concepts to which most people can relate.
After all, surely the objective is to enlist as much support as possible for a proper and unspun investigation?
Quoted from their site...
The CIA Fakes is a catchphrase term to describe a group which includes:
-
Covert Operatives of the CIA, NSA and DIA; of the U.S. Corporate/Military Industrial Complex; of the intelligence services of U.K. Spain, France Holland, Germany, and Russia.
Political Agents working within the Democratic Party, Republican Party, Democratic Black Caucus, Green Party, and Patriot Movement.
Politicians in the U.S., U.K. Spain, France, Germany and Russia - who pose as 9/11 skeptics.
Media, including Mainstream, Alternative Media and Internet broadcasting media who either front for, cooperate with, or are directly employed by intelligence services mentioned above.
The primary objectives of the CIA FAKES are:
-
To leverage the Fakes into position as the leadership/spokespersons for the 9/11 skeptics movement.
To splinter and divide that movement.
To promote lame, tame and/or booby-trapped questions about 9/11.
To be sufficiently over-the-top as to prevent the 9/11 issue getting any traction in the media or left-wing.
To ensure that the movement would not have a politically-active leadership capable of turning it into an effective political lobby campaign.
RETURNING TO MY ORIGINAL TEXT:
Carefully and objectively examining all the evidence, witness testimonies and documentation about 9/11 that is now available in the public domain, I cannot see how any rational person can come to a conclusion other than that the “official†explanation of the 9/11 event (with particular regard to the collapse of the Twin Towers) requires us to accept that the natural Laws of Physics were inexplicably and magically suspended on that day.And if the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse is wanting, then so too may be the apportioning of the blame by the Bush administration.
Examine the evidence, the witness testimonies, and the commentaries for yourself - and then remind yourself that 9/11 was the trigger event for Bush’s bombing of Afghanistan, invasion of Iraq, declaration of the so-called “War on Terrorâ€, and continuing encroachments upon the civil liberties of the American people.
But, I contend, it is a mistake to examine 9/11 out of context, as a stand-alone event. It could not have, and did not, “spring from nowhereâ€.
This applies equally whether the official explanation is correct or not. And, equally, 9/11 could not have been executed without detailed long-term planning and sophisticated preparations.
If the official explanation is not correct (and all the indications appear to point in this direction) then I suspect time could beneficially be spent examining some of the events that were occurring on the American economic scene in the months prior to 9/11 - an unfolding of matters that were suddenly and dramatically wiped from public attention by 9/11.
Moreover it could be equally as beneficial to look at the controversies surrounding the Presidential election that first put George Bush into the White House. I find it difficult to avoid the conclusion that this move was engineered specifically to ensure that GBW would be the “9/11 Presidentâ€.
Think about it!
For this continues to be an issue, time elapsed notwithstanding, that has grave implications not just for the American public but for all peoples everywhere.
It is some forty-odd years now since that fateful day when John F. Kennedy was assassinated.
During those years suggestions that the Warren Commission report was seriously flawed and that Lee Harvey Oswald was a scapegoat for shadowy figures that conspired to perpetrate that shocking act have become much more widely accepted, such that it is now probably a minority who don't think the assassination was result of a conspiracy.
Yet no-one has ever been called to account. Justice has never been satisfied.
Are we to witness the same with 9/11?
Will all the mounting indications of an act of terrorism perpetrated from within simply become absorbed by the national consciousness to the extent that the upholders of the "jihadists theory" recede into a minority... yet still no-one be held accountable?
Of course, with the ongoing situations in Afghanistan and Iraq; with the tensions that have been manipulatively created regarding Iran; with the widely trumpeted "threats" of terrorism from without; with fears of climate change and life-threatening extreme weather events ensuing therefrom it is all too easy for 9/11 to end up on the back burner.
Is this what the true perpetrators are counting upon? Not that 9/11 will be forgotten, but that it will simply become part of a cultural heritage that doesn't include consequences for the real criminals. Are we really going to let that happen again?
Nor is it especially difficult, now, to put some names on the table. Is it?
ResourcesLinks to useful videos, websites and info
Israel breaks all world records!
Congratulations, Israel!
It only took you 60 odd years to break every world record!
And now you have finally achieved the unthinkable!
You have succeeded in creating a virtual LIVING HELL!
Once again, congratulations O Israel!...
Seems you learned a lot from the Nazis.
Thanks factnose
Be sure to check these guys out!
Musicians Say No! To Bush World Order. AKA Red.
Grab this banner for your page to show solidarity with us. In the box below just right-click and "select all", then right-click "copy", and then paste the code wherever you want it on your page.