I'd like to meet:

Today, We Have “Gods” Walking Among Us That Know The Future, Armed With The Idols Known as Computer Models

Over 100 Prominent Scientists Warn UN: Attempting To Control Climate Is 'Futile'

The UN climate conference met strong opposition Thursday from a team of over 100 prominent international scientists, who warned the UN, that attempting to control the Earth's climate was "ultimately futile."

The scientists, many of whom are current and former UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) scientists, released an open letter to the UN Secretary-General questioning the scientific basis for climate fears and the UN's so-called "solutions."

"Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity's real and pressing problems," the letter signed by the scientists read. The December 13 letter was released to the public late Thursday.

Read the letter...
Check out the signatories...

***NEW***

Snow Disaster Leaves 1.6 mln People Frostbitten in NW China Province

Al Gore told there are Nine Inconvenient Truths in his Film

Hey Al Gore, We Want a Refund!

The Trees Were Kidding: World Was Warmer Just a Few Centuries Ago

Carbon Dioxide Did Not End The Last Ice Age, Study Says

Global warming is over! Man was never responsible. See full blog HERE .
Temperature Monitors Report Widescale Global Cooling

See large image HERE

A compiled list of all the sources can be seen HERE. The total amount of cooling ranges from 0.65C up to 0.75C—a value large enough to wipe out nearly all the warming recorded over the past 100 years. All in one year’s time. For all four sources, it’s the single fastest temperature change ever recorded, either up or down. Read more HERE.

"Contrary to the IPCC's speculation about man-made global warming as high as 5.8° C within the next hundred years," said Landscheidt, a long period of cool climate with its coldest phase around 2030 is to be expected. It can be seen, added Landscheidt, that the Gleissberg minimum around 2030 and another one around 2200 will be of the Maunder minimum type accompanied by severe cooling on Earth."
See what Al Gore really has in store for us...
Global Warming or Global Governance? (LINK)

Gore barely mentions the Kyoto Protocol in his film and says nothing about what sacrifices people will have to make in order to reduce CO2 emissions. He does say, however, that combating CO2-induced global warming will take a commitment similar to what the country had to make to win World War II. At some point in this climate war the government will ration CO2 and issue "carbon credits" – CO2 ration cards. In World War II Americans had to have the appropriate ration card to purchase gasoline, tires, coffee, sugar, meat, and shoes; a certificate to purchase a stove; and an authorization for vacation travel. At the height of the War on CO2 global governance, which only a socialist state can provide, will be required to rein in CO2 emissions, with international inspectors at one’s doorstep prosecuting and confiscating property of people and industries that make "greedy [CO2-producing] choices," like using an air-conditioner and driving a SUV.

Gore As Religious Figure

10 May 07 - "For those who have disavowed conventional religion and have decided that man is the ultimate power - by which they mean themselves in particular, not just humanity in general - the thought that they alone can save the planet is heady stuff, indeed."Who needs a god when they have placed themselves at that pinnacle?Environmentalists have been gestating their religious fervor for a decade or more but it lacked a central, savior-like figure who they could all worship together. I think it is safe to say, though, that they have found their Christ redux.For Al Gore has come.On Saturday, May 5th, Gore spoke the words that sent him from advocate to religious figure. Speaking to an Architect’s convention in San Antonio, Gore likened his quest to a "spiritual crisis" and placed himself and his followers into the role of savior of the planet. Gore is no longer trying to advance a scientific theory and solution. He thinks of himself in messianic terms and views his followers as the last hope of the planet.Global warming is now a full-blown religion and Al Gore is their messiah."READ MORE HERE
Replacing the Bible with "An Inconvenient Truth"
READ MORE ARTICLES HERE

Also read more related articles from this source on 'global warming' http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/270407sickand tired.htm HERE
Alarmist Global Warming Claims Melt Under Scientific Scrutiny
June 30, 2007 BY JAMES M. TAYLOR In his new book, The Assault on Reason, Al Gore pleads, "We must stop tolerating the rejection and distortion of science. We must insist on an end to the cynical use of pseudo-studies known to be false for the purpose of intentionally clouding the public's ability to discern the truth." Gore repeatedly asks that science and reason displace cynical political posturing as the central focus of public discourse. If Gore really means what he writes, he has an opportunity to make a difference by leading by example on the issue of global warming.Many of the assertions Gore makes in his movie, "An Inconvenient Truth", have been refuted by science, both before and after he made them. Gore can show sincerity in his plea for scientific honesty by publicly acknowledging where science has rebutted his claims
READ IT HERE

WAR ON GORE - FROM LAROUCHE

Over 100 Prominent Scientists Warn UN: Attempting To Control Climate Is 'Futile'

The UN climate conference met strong opposition Thursday from a team of over 100 prominent international scientists, who warned the UN, that attempting to control the Earth's climate was "ultimately futile."

The scientists, many of whom are current and former UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) scientists, released an open letter to the UN Secretary-General questioning the scientific basis for climate fears and the UN's so-called "solutions."

"Attempts to prevent global climate change from occurring are ultimately futile, and constitute a tragic misallocation of resources that would be better spent on humanity's real and pressing problems," the letter signed by the scientists read. The December 13 letter was released to the public late Thursday.

Read the letter...
Check out the signatories...

Forthcoming 21st century cooling Projection of the cyclic historic pattern of sunspot activity suggests that a 21st century cooling will be driven by falling solar activity, perhaps even to the level of the cold Maunder minimum in the 17th century. By Professor Bob Carter
"New Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears" ( LINK )

The Cost of Global Frauding
From Marc Morano, Senate Staffer
October 19, 2007

The Lieberman-Warner bill will burden American families with additional energy costs and significantly harm the United States economy...

CO2 cap-and-trade schemes were exposed by a recent CBO (Congressional Budget Office) study as creating massive wealth redistribution from the poor and working class to wealthier Americans. Further, according to a MIT study released earlier this year, cap-and-trade legislation introduced earlier in the Senate this year by Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) and Senator Boxer (D-CA) would cost energy sector consumers an amount equal to $4,500 per American family of four. The same study found a bill sponsored by Senator Lieberman and Senator McCain (R-AZ) would cost consumers $3,500 per family of four. And a new EPA analysis shows the Lieberman - McCain bill would cost up to half a trillion dollars by 2030 and $1.3 trillion by 2050 - and that was based on assumptions designed to low-ball the number, begging the question of how high the real figure would be. MORE

The Science of Global Warming
in Perspective

When an ice age begins, global Warming occurs exactly as it is doing now. Heated oceans cause precipitation to increase. Eventually, increased snowfall will reflect away solar energy and trigger a cool-down.

Ocean Temperatures over 800,000 Years.

Each cycle is an ice age.
Now is above the dotted line on the right side. The oceans have been heating continuously since the last ice age. see below

graph source one
graph source two

Study shows oceans are the cause of temperature increase.

Arctic ice has melted faster than expected, because oceans are heating more than the atmosphere. (We're in a warm cycle of the AMO and stronger than normal wind patterns ushered sea ice out of the Greenland sea much faster than normal)

No atmospheric temperature increase has been found in nine years and is actually in a cooling trend.

Alarmists are not promoting science; they are promoting propaganda justified through a black-box analysis which generates contrived numbers. Science requires evidence and logic.

There is no mechanism for carbon dioxide creating global warming

"Greenhouse gases" absorb all radiation available to them in a few meters. More of the gas cannot absorb more radiation. A thick sheet of plastic does nothing more than a thin sheet. Doubling the CO2 would only shorten the distance for absorption of radiation from 10 meters to 5 meters, which is not an increase in temperature.
Here's a quantitative reason why carbon dioxide does not create global warming:

The sun's energy goes through the atmosphere and strikes the earth's surface.

claimed heat due to atmosphere --- 33°C

95-99% due to various things --- 31.4°C

1-5% due to infrared radiation from earth's surface --- 1.65°C

8% of infrared bandwidth available to CO2 --- 0.13°C

3% of CO2 produced by humans --- 0.0039°C

5% of absorption "unsaturated" for global warming --- 0.0002°C

claimed global warming --- 0.6°C

Explanations — Crunching the Numbers

This means carbon dioxide cannot trap radiant energy near the surface of the earth. To get around this, an obfuscated mechanism is contrived for heat leaving the atmosphere. But it is a miniscule effect in the stratosphere, with little influence over the lower atmosphere.

The 41% Fraud
The 30% Fraud

How could all of those scientists be wrong? They get paid to be wrong through billions of dollars from government; and they are not a consensus.

It's important to realize that radiation from the sun cannot be absorbed by carbon dioxide, because the sun must give off high frequency radiation in the area of visible light, which goes through the atmosphere. Something as hot as the sun cannot give off low frequency radiation, called infrared. This means that the sun's radiation heats the surface of the earth, and then the heat moves from the earth's surface into the atmosphere through conduction, convection, evaporation and infrared radiation. The infrared radiation can be absorbed by so-called greenhouse gases.

The real cause of global warming could be an increase in solar energy, but there is some evidence that it is due to variations in heat from the earth's core. Ice ages are caused by oceans heating, which appears to result from increased heat from inside the earth. The primary evidence is the exact cycling of ice ages. Environmental factors would not be so precise. Also, the oceans heating more than the atmosphere points to the heat coming from inside the earth.
Atmospheric changes can result from variations in solar activity, but they are superficial compared to heat from the earth's core which may drive ice age cycles.
Volcanoes Show how Sunshine Heats Oceans — external linkIce over the Arctic is melting much faster than expected. The reason is because the oceans are heating, not the atmosphere. Heated oceans can melt ice rapidly, while heated air cannot. Ninety percent of ice is below the surface—exposed to water, not air—and water has the heat capacity needed for melting.

News Item:
"Carbon dioxide - the greenhouse gas considered most responsible for global warming..."

Wrong. There isn't a scientist alive who doesn't say water vapor is a stronger greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. It absorbs three times the bandwidth of radiation and has thirty times as many molecules in the atmosphere.

Why don't people know more about the science which they are using to bankrupt the world with? They don't want to know, because global warming is a convert war against the lower classes, not a science and technology issue.

List of Critical Facts

1. Everything in the atmosphere is a greenhouse gas including water vapor which does a hundred times as much of what CO2 does, and in a much more varied way, which totally swamps the miniscule effects of CO2. In other words, a one percent variation in water vapor effect would be equivalent to doubling the CO2 effect. Water Vapor Fraud

2. Oceans regulate CO2 in the atmosphere to the minutest detail.
measurements by Segalstad
This is shown by an El Nino in the Pacific Ocean, which causes CO2 measurements in the air to increase, and then they renormalize when the El Nino disappears. External Link on El Nino
If regulation were not occurring, there would be so much CO2 in the air that life would be impossible, because nothing else defines the amount in the air, and huge quantities have been accumulating in the oceans.
( Note )

3. There is no "delicate balance" for humans to upset, because the CO2 going in from decay has no relationship to the CO2 coming out through photosynthesis. Nature produces 33 times as much CO2 as humans, and the total in the atmosphere was five times as much during the dinosaur years.

4. The reason why CO2 levels in the atmosphere have been increasing is because warmer oceans release more CO2.

5. Greenhouse gases absorb all radiation available to them in short distances, which means more greenhouse gas only shortens the distance of absorption, which is not an increase in heat. The first 20% of the CO2 in the atmosphere does most of what CO2 does.

6. Carbon dioxide absorbs radiation in narrow bands, which means most radiation goes around it.

7. Very little radiation is emitted from the surface of the earth. It's about 1-5% of the energy, not the 41-115% which is variously claimed. The 41% Fraud

8. Supposedly, shoulders on the CO2 absorption peaks create global warming high in the atmosphere, because they separate from water vapor peaks; but the shoulders become miniscule, which is why they separate, and the height is in the stratosphere, which doesn't mix with the lower atmosphere.
Stratospheric Hype

9. Only the last cycle of emission high in the atmosphere is relevant, because only then do more molecules capture radiation which would not otherwise be captured. But the last cycles are usually too high in the atmosphere to have much effect upon the lower atmosphere.

10. Climate scientists know that heating caused by CO2 is indeed small, but supposedly it's effect is amplified by a factor of 3 or more by creating more water vapor. If multiplying the heat were possible, it would create thermal runaway, as the heat from the water vapor would also be multiplied. The Water Vapor Fraud

11. Humans add 3% of the CO2 to the atmosphere, while nature adds 97%. To claim the human addition accumulates to 30%, while the nature addition does not is absurd. The 30% Fraud

12. The claimed 0.6°C atmospheric temperature increase is a contrivance. Satellites show less, and thermometers are worthless for the purpose.
Satellite Measurements—Spencer
Thermomenter Errors—Keenan

13. The known increase in precipitation is being attributed to increased air temperature causing more evaporation. But relative humidity must be reduced with increased temperature, which precludes increased precipitation. Only oceans heating can cause increased precipitation . (You can't imagine what a bunch of idiots there are in science.)

14. Oceans are only rising 1.8mm per year (7 inches per century), and sea level will be decreasing, because increased precipitation is causing ice to accumulate over Antarctica and Greenland. See Oceans Page

15. The latest claim is that humans are putting 8.3 giga tons of carbon into the air per year, which is 1% of the 750 giga tons in the air. If one percent per year were relevant, natural variations would have been catastrophic long ago. External Link Showing Past Variations

16. Ice is melting faster than expected over oceans, particularly the Arctic. This is because oceans are heating, not the atmosphere. Increased precipitation also shows oceans are heating. A hot spot in the earth's core is the most likely cause. See Below

17. Several years ago, more than seventeen thousand scientists signed a petition saying humans producing carbon dioxide is not the cause of global warming. But now many are intimidated and afraid to speak out. External Link

18. Propagandists have nothing but a black box for science—not even a mechanism to explain how CO2 creates global warming.

The public has a responsibility in determining whether social realities are based on rationality or fraud. There are highly visible differences. Rationality doesn't look anything like fraud. Rationality includes explanations and evidence. Fraud is forced down peoples' throats without explanations or evidence based on a fake consensus, which is nothing but mob rule.

Oceans are Warming

There are two points of evidence indicating that oceans are warming: One is that precipitation is increasing; and the other is that ice is melting over oceans more than over land.

The oceans have a heat capacity 1,000 times that of the atmosphere. This means the air cannot easily heat the oceans, but oceans can easily heat the air. The atmosphere would have to heat a lot, before it could heat the oceans a little; yet the opposite is occurring. The atmosphere is only said to have warmed 0.6°C in recent times.

The ice which is suspended over the oceans is 90% submerged. To melt it, the water has to provide the heat, not the air. Not only is the water surrounding 90% of the ice, but water has the heat capacity needed to transfer a large amount of heat, while air has little heat capacity.

*NOTE by ME: Sea ice at the South pole reached a RECORD MAXIMUM, it is the North pole that is in a warm cycle of the AMO (Atlantic Multidecadal Ocillation) ALSO check out NASA Sees Arctic Ocean Circulation Do An About-Face

Also the Arctic re-gaied lost ice at a record pace of Some 58,000 square miles of ice formed per day for 10 days in late October and early November, a new record! But this was obviously ignored by the MSM In localized areas, there is warming over land which is melting showpiece glaciers and northern tundra. But where it really matters, over the Antarctica land mass, ice is thickening. Over Greenland, both thickening and thinning of ice is occurring, but Greenland is small, and it's climate is influenced by an ocean current called the Gulf Stream.

The ultimate test of whether the oceans or atmosphere is heating more is precipitation, and it is increasing. If the atmosphere were heating more than the oceans, there would be less precipitation, because warmer air holds more moisture. If the oceans are heating more than the air, more precipitation occurs, because evaporation increases, while there is less change in the amount of moisture the air will hold.

Because of the increase in precipitation, ice is thickening over land at Antarctica and Greenland, as shown by satellites which use radar to measure thickness of ice. (Details and references are on Oceans Page ).

Deep Ocean Heat Measured - (external)

Ice Ages

The present global warming is part of a natural ice age cycle. It's what always happens at the beginning of an ice age.

Ice ages cycle at precise 100 thousand year intervals. The next one is scheduled to begin now. The temperature reversal will begin between 100 and 200 years from now. The time can be determined from the amount of precipitation. Cold temperatures alone cannot create an ice age. There has to be more snow than can melt during the summer to create an accumulation of ice. There is not enough moisture in the air at this time to do that. But it's increasing. There should be enough precipitation in a century or two to produce more snow than can melt during the summers in low enough latitudes to reflect away enough solar energy to trigger an irreversible cool-down.

The amount of moisture in the air is increasing because oceans are warming. The warming of oceans is observable in the amount of ice melting at the poles. Measurement of long term trends show ocean temperatures to be peaking at a level where ice age reversals begin.

Such precise cycling of temperatures cannot be caused by environmental factors such as greenhouse gases, because there would be too many variations. The variations would be like trying to use the clouds for a calendar. The cause of ice ages must be some force which overrides environmental influences. Two possible sources are cyclic variation in solar energy and motion of a hot spot in the earth's core. An underlying factor is that ice age cycles correlate with a variable in the earth's orbit.

Orbital influences could explain either variations in solar energy or motion of a hot spot in the earth's core. No one has been able to clearly identify a factor in the orbit of the earth which would increase solar intensity in a way which correlates with ice age cycles, not the least reason being that there is a huge amount of complexity in several variables in the orbit of the earth. There are additional problems in explaining ice age cycles in terms of solar intensity. There are many environmental factors which interact with solar energy creating variations in the result. But it's not impossible that solar variations could override all environmental complexities and create the ice age cycles as shown on the graph.

There is however a clearer impression that the oceans are being heated from within the earth's core. The main factor creating this impression, besides total immunity of the cycles to environmental influences, is that all other changes show clear evidence of following the ocean temperature increases rather than responding to some other influence. The most significant factor is that precipitation is increasing.

Areas where weather patterns indicate warming are all microclimates resulting from nearby oceans being warmer. The most obvious example of this is Greenland and parts of Europe, which are warmed by the Gulf Stream. North America is showing milder winters due to less ice around Alaska, where the winter air often comes from. But satellite measurements show little warming in evaluating total global conditions. Global warming is occurring, but it's not the frying pan situation that it is portrayed as.

Movement of a hot spot in the earth's core could correlate with changes in the earth's orbit. The central core of the earth could be pulled farther south due to gravitational effects, and this would heat the oceans more, since there is less land area in the southern hemisphere. For details on earth's orbit see external link here: Tilt in Earth's Orbit

Heat from Earth's Core

Heat constantly migrates from the core of the earth to the surface. This heat keeps lakes from freezing solid, after ice forms on the surface. It keeps the ground from freezing more than six feet deep in the winter. It causes deep well water to be hot, which can sometimes be used for geothermal heating.

Therefore, the cause of global warming could be oceans increasing in temperature due to increased heat flowing from the earth's core. The increased heat could be due to a hot spot which rotates in the molten fluid within the earth. As it rotates, it could get closer to the surface in an area where the heat can diffuse into the oceans.

Or it could be the central core being pulled closer to the surface due to gravitational forces in the solar system related to changes in the earth's orbit. The central core of the earth is highly dense, consisting largely of iron, which would cause it to respond to gravitational forces. Magnetic north constantly migrates demonstrating that masses move around in the molten fluid within the earth.

There is new evidence for the earth's core heating based on variations in the earth's magnetic field. There is about a six year lag for "global warming" correlating with the amount of time required for the heat to conduct through the mantle. A summary article is here:
http://www.gsaaj.org/articles/TempPaperv1n22007.pdf

Some Data

"Total human CO2 emissions primarily from use of coal, oil, and natural gas and the production of cement are currently about 5.5 GT C per year (giga tons of carbon per year). A recent update says 8.6 GT, which probably includes the usual stretching.

To put these figures in perspective, it is estimated that the atmosphere contains 750 GT C; the surface ocean contains 1,000 GT C; vegetation, soils, and detritus contain 2,200 GT C; and the intermediate and deep oceans contain 38,000 GT C. Each year, the surface ocean and atmosphere exchange an estimated 90 GT C; vegetation and the atmosphere, 60 GT C; marine biota and the surface ocean, 50 GT C; and the surface ocean and the intermediate and deep oceans, 100 GT C."

Reference:
Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine

Notice that humans only add 1% as much CO2 to the atmosphere per year as already in it. If such a miniscule amount were as critical as propagandists claim, all life would have been destroyed long ago. Nature hasn't been sitting on a 1% knife edge for millions of years.

Climate Change: The carbon creates the droughts, and the oxygen creates the floods. Since it does two things, they call it CO2. If you don't believe that, it's because you promote big oil and big tobacco, and you refuse to look at the science of the subject. The IPCC said so; and it's peer reviewed science.

Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC & Al Gore.

Complete U.S. Senate Report Now Available: ( LINK )

"Solar activity has overpowered any effect that CO2 has had before, and it most likely will again, in fact, we should be more afraid of a cooling trend because of a solar minimum that will peak in 2030 that could be fairly large. As we saw from a minor solar minimum in the mid 1900s, the earth suddenly started to cool. If we were to have even a medium sized solar minimum, we could be looking at a lot more bad effects than 'global warming' would have had."

Help Stop Al Gore - Add my Banner(s) to Your Site!

Stop Al Gore!

click here to help stop him!Stop Al Gore!

click here to help stop him

Music:

Mupet Models for Puppet Polititions

Sanity over ‘global warming’ is starting to break out in the most unexpected of places: ‘Climate is too complex for accurate predictions’ New Scientist Environment, October 25)

“Climate change models, no matter how powerful, can never give a precise prediction of how greenhouse gases will warm the Earth, according to a new study. The result will provide ammunition to those who argue not enough is known about global warming to warrant taking action.” Well, well. Now there is a surprise. [The study in question will be found in the journal, Science (October 26, 2007: 318 (5850), 629.|DOI: 10.1126/science.1144735) Why Is Climate Sensitivity So Unpredictable?’ by Gerard H. Roe and Marcia B. Baker of the Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle An associated commentary (October 26, 2007: Vol. 318. no. 5850, pp. 582 - 583|DOI: 10.1126/science.1149988): ‘Call Off The Quest’ is especially illuminating. The commentators are Myles R. Allen and David J. Frame, from the Department of Physics and the Centre for Environment respectively, the University of Oxford] In essence, to the frustration of policy makers, model temperature estimates have not become more precise over the last 20 years. Moreover: “It now appears that the estimates will never get much better”, while... better computer models or observational data will not do much to reduce that uncertainty.”
Ultimately, the papers also illustrate the limits to which models, even those produced by powerful supercomputers, can help politicians make decisions Absolutely. Taking all the models and temperature ranges proposed for the UK alone, there is an error bar of over 8 degrees C. What use is that to farmers, to business planners, or to anybody else for that matter, especially when nobody has the foggiest idea about precipitation or regional variations?

F U N F A C T S about CARBON DIOXIDE* Of the 186 billion tons of CO2 that enter earth's atmosphere each year from all sources, only 6 billion tons are from human activity. Approximately 90 billion tons come from biologic activity in earth's oceans and another 90 billion tons from such sources as volcanoes and decaying land plants. * At 383 parts per million CO2 is a minor constituent of earth's atmosphere - less than 4/100ths of 1% of all gases present . Compared to former geologic times, earth's current atmosphere is CO2- impoverished . * CO2 is odorless, colorless, and tasteless. Plants absorb CO2 and emit oxygen as a waste product. Humans and animals breathe oxygen and emit CO2 as a waste product. Carbon dioxide is a nutrient, not a pollutant, and all life - plants and animals alike - benefit from more of it. All life on earth is carbon-based and CO2 is an essential ingredient. When plant-growers want to stimulate plant growth, they introduce more carbon dioxide. * CO2 that goes into the atmosphere does not stay there but is continually recycled by terrestrial plant life and earth's oceans-- the great retirement home for most terrestrial carbon dioxide. ** If we are in a global warming crisis today, even the most aggressive and costly proposals for limiting industrial carbon dioxide emissions would have a negligible effect on global climate!

*"Greenhouse gases" in Earth's atmosphere also influence Earth's temperature, but in a much smaller way. Human additions to total greenhouse gases play a still smaller role, contributing about 0.2% - 0.3% to Earth's greenhouse effect .

*****************************************************
CO 2 MYTHS, FACTS & REALITIES - PROOF that todays CO 2 levels are NOT Unnatural or Unusual!

Notice this is the undisputed absorption properties of all GHG's in our atmosphere. This clearly displays the true forcing CO2 rightfully diservers...which to say the least isn't much!
FALSE LOW PRE-INDUSTRIAL CO 2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE
There is substantial proof that today's claimed 'abnormally high' CO2 is a victim of weakensses in proxy studies
(I/O a thousand years from now today's CO2 levels will show up as a little bump in proxy studies, spikes etc will be smoothed out. Proxies give good indications of the past but do not pick up every little detail)
See study:
READ PEER REVIEWED STUDY
AND READ ANOTHER PEER REVIEWED STUDY
180 Years of atmospheric CO 2 Gas Analysis by Chemical Methods
Historic (CO2 Peak) papers Data - Methods - All provide substantial proof there have been much higher CO2 amounts than today's as recent as the 1940's without any ill effect on our climate.
Me-Why were the higher reading ignored? Answer: To make it appear that "today's C0 2 levels are highest it's been in 650k years!" Alot easier to make false claims than it is to scientifically dissprove them. When that daunting & expensive task is completed and studies like these are completed; the Pro-MMGW crowd engages in a smear campaign too easily accepted with the all too familiar accuastion of "Their in the pay of oil or coal.
See study here:
READ PEER REVIEWED STUDY
********************************************************** The Manipulation of Reality, The Falsified History of C0 2

READ PEER REVIEWED STUDY
READ ANOTHER PEER REVIEWED STUDY HERE
**********************************************************

The Fraud of Global Warming: True C0 2 Record Buried Under Gore

This press release is also available in PDF

by Laurence Hecht Editor, 21st Century Science & Technology

The historical record of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, claimed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as the justification for greenhouse gas reduction, is a fraud. Research by a Freiburg, Germany professor, Ernst-Georg Beck of the Merian-Schule, shows that the IPCC construed and concocted the pre-1957 CO 2 record from measurements on recently drilled ice cores, ignoring more than 90,000 direct measurements by chemical methods from 1857 to 1957.

The IPCC's hoked-up record attempts to prove that CO 2 concentrations have been steadily increasing with the progress of human industrial civilization. Beck's work confirms a wealth of previous investigations which demonstrate that the IPCC cherrypicked its data in an attempt to prove that we must stop industrial development and return to the horse-and-buggy age, or face oppressive heat and melting of the polar ice caps. It shows that the Kyoto Treaty on reduction of greenhouse gases was based on a scientific fraud which violates the laws of the universe, denying the well-established determination of climate by cyclical variations in the Earth-Sun orbital relationship and in the Sun's heat output.

In a thorough review of 175 scientific papers, Professor Beck found that the founders of modern greenhouse theory, Guy Stewart Callendar and Charles David Keeling (a special idol of Al Gore's), had completely ignored careful and systematic measurements by some of the most famous names of physical chemistry, among them several Nobel prize winners. Measurements by these chemists showed that today's atmospheric CO 2 concentration of about 380 parts per million (ppm) have been exceeded in the past, including a period from 1936 to 1944, when the CO 2 levels varied from 393.0 to 454.7 ppm.

****************************************************

Movies:

(Absolutely must-see Weather Channel Founder Discusses Global Warming Myth With Glenn Beck video availabe here )
Weather Forecast | Weather Maps | Weather RadarABC's 20/20 John Stossel segment on Global WarmingClimate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 1Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 2Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 3Climate Change - Is CO2 the cause? - Pt 4Global Warming or Global Governance?
See: http://www.globalwarmingglobalgovernance.comEnviron-Mentalism: A New Religion for a New AgeGreenpeace BULL SHITCO2 & Glaciers, what you're not being toldGlobal Cooling: The Coming Ice AgeMore of GORE's LIES EXPOSED!An Inconvenient Truth... or Convenient Fiction? Part IAn Inconvenient Truth... or Convenient Fiction? Part IIGlobal Warming Smokings Guns; Exposing the Myths by The Internet Skeptic. Long but very good study on cause and effectGlobal Warming: An Unsettled ScienceScare tactics in An Inconvenient Truth - Parental disgression advised!Green House Conspiracy

Television:

The Other Side of the Global Warming Debate:
(A very partial list - If you want to have one added, send me the link and I'll put it on the list)

Science and Public Policy
Global Warming and Nature's Thermostat by Roy W. Spencer
The Cooling World
Climate change: The Deniers (National Post)
Friends of Science
A Parliament of Things
EnviroSpin
NumberWatch
Living Issues
Canada Free Press
Global Warming Hysteria (cooled)
Global Warming Skeptics
ClimatePolice.com
American.com
PanicWatch.org
Global Warming Hyperbole
Climate Resistance
View From The Cheap Seats
Internet Radio Network
globalwarmingism
Global Warming News
ClimateBrains.com
Global Warming and the Climate

* Junk Science (Steve Milloy, B.A. Natural Sciences, M.S. Health Sciences)
* NewsBusters (Media Research Center)
* The Reference Frame (Lubo,, Motl, Ph.D. Theoretical Physicist)
Climate Audit (Stephen McIntyre, B.Sc. Mathematics)
Climate Police (Joseph Conklin, M.S. Meteorology)
Climate Science (Roger A. Pielke, Ph.D. Meteorology)
CO2 Science (Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change)
ecoEnquirer (Satire)
Friends of Science
Global Warming.org (The Cooler Heads Coalition)
Global Warming Heartland (Heartland Institute)
Global Warming Hyperbole (David Evans, B.Sc. Applied Mathematics and Physics, Ph.D. Electrical Engineering)
Global Warming Hysteria
Global Warming Debunking News and Views (Arthur B. Robinson, Ph.D. Chemistry)
Global Warming Petition Project
Global Warming Skeptics
Greenie Watch (John J. Ray, Ph.D. Psychology, Mensa Member)
ICECAP (International Climate and Environmental Change Assessment Project)
Johnston's Archive - Environmental Topics
Planet Gore (National Review Online)
Ponder the Maunder
US Senate Environment & Public Works Committee
Science & Public Policy Institute
Science is Broken (Gary Novak, M.S. Microbiology)
Still Waiting for Greenhouse
surfacestations.org (Anthony Watts, Meteorologist)
TCS Daily - Science Roundtable
The Association of British Drivers - Environment
The Association of British Drivers - Links - 'Global Warming'
The Global Warming Hoax
The Global Warming Hoax.wordpress
The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition
Ultimate Global Warming Challenge (Steve Milloy, B.A. Natural Sciences, M.S. Health Sciences)
Watts Up With That? (Anthony Watts, Meteorologist)
World Climate Report (Patrick J. Michaels, Ph.D. Ecological Climatology)http://personals.galaxyinternet.net/tunga/OSGWD.htm
********************************************** http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/about-us/
********************************************** http://www.john-daly.com/index.htm
********************************************** http://junkscience.com/
********************************************** http://www.friendsofscience.org/index.php?id=8 ********************************************** http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2ScienceB2C/Index.jsp
********************************************** http://www.nrsp.com/default.html ********************************************** http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/ ********************************************** http://www.norcalblogs.com/watts/ ********************************************** http://antigreen.blogspot.com/ ********************************************** http://www.iceagenow.com/index.htm ********************************************** http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php ********************************************** http://surfacestations.org/ ********************************************** http://demanddebate.com/ ********************************************** http://www.schnittshow.com/globalwarming.html
********************************************** http://www.scientific-alliance.com/index.htm ********************************************** http://www.warwickhughes.com/
********************************************** http://climatesci.colorado.edu/ **********************************************
EPW Senate
********************************************** http://www.lavoisier.com.au/
********************************************** http://climatepatrol.com/ ********************************************** http://www.sepp.org/ **********************************************
Crunching the Numbers
Absorption Spectra
Details Explained
Oceans not Rising
Future Ice Age
Acid in the Oceans
External Links:
Railroaded Science - By Richard Lindzen
Al Gore is Wrong - By Richard Lindzen
Fraudulent Consensus - By James Inhofe
CO2 Absorption at 15 µM - By Heinz Hug
More Oceans Heating
temperature graphs through ice ages
Latest on Ice Core Measurements
Jaworowski: critic of ice core measurements
Heat in Earth's Interior
Interview of Fred Singer
Fred Singer's Web Site
Temperature Measurements
CO2 Science Org
A look at the Numbers
High Levels of CO2
El Nino and CO2
Political Criticism. May 24, 2006
Social Control - Constance Cumbe
Bio fuels Destroy Environments
Historical Summary
Raw Data on CO2 in Air
Extremes in Past
Solar energy as Cause
Tilt in Earth's Orbit
Oceans Heating at Antarctica
Deep Ocean Heat
Antarctica Grounding Line
CO2 Criticisms—Segalstad
Termodynamics - PDF — Gerlich and Tscheuschner
New Oceanograhy Study — by Anthoni

Forum on Breakfornews.com:
Latest on Global Warming Bunk
They call this a consensus?! Straight from IPCC report - Note the 'level of scientific understanding' See how many 'VERY LOW' there are!? See how "SOLAR" is portrayed? It's given a tiny positive forcing value...In reality it is both a positive and negative forcing at much greater value than shown!Meanwhile CO2 continues to enjoy the limelight.
The Big Secret: Climate Bills Result in No Meaningful Impact on Global Temperature

Climate Change Bill Has a Cost: $494 a Year for Every U.S. Man, Woman and Child
What's another $500 taken out of your paycheck over the course of a year? It probably isn't much to global warming alarmists like Al Gore, but that's what it could cost you if legislation pending in the U.S. Senate is passed into law. Does that $500 have your attention? Well, multiply that times every member of your immediate family.
According to a November 11 Washington Times editorial, a bill introduced in the Senate by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and John Warner (R-Va.) that would require companies to scale back greenhouse-gas emissions could cost Americans $4 trillion to $6 trillion over the next 40 years. If that bill were passed and made law, the tax would cost every man, woman and child - more than 303 million Americans - $494 a year, a significant burden on the U.S. economy.
If you're not yet skeptical of this global warming initiative, listen to former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, who warns the effects of carbon caps would be limited unless imposed globally. He said in his book, "The Age of Turbulence," that caps imposed only on the United States could be detrimental.
"There is no effective way to meaningfully reduce emissions without negatively impacting a large part of an economy," Greenspan wrote. "Net, it is a tax. If the cap is low enough to make a meaningful inroad into CO2 emissions, permits will become expensive and large numbers of companies will experience cost increases that make them less competitive. Jobs will be lost and real incomes of workers constrained."
Source

Cap-and-Trade Could Cost Average Family $10,800 in Lost Incomeh

A cap-and-trade scheme for controlling greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) would impose significant economic costs on the U.S. economy and is not a sound policy response to current concerns about global warming, says renown economist Arthur Laffer in a new study released today.

MEDIA RELEASE
SEE STUDY
Climate Bill Shaves $533 BILLION off Economy!
Aug 6, 2007
READ MORE HERE
Clinton, Obama sign onto to Boxer’s $4,500 climate tax on American families
Posted at Senate.Gov by Marc Morano - [email protected] - 1:34 PM ET

Senate Environment & Public Works Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) have proposed the “Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act” aimed at combating climate change. The proposed partisan bill (S.309) is supported by another 15 senators, including: Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY); Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL); Sen. Christopher J. Dodd (D-CT) and more...

FACT: A new MIT study concludes that the Sanders-Boxer approach would impose a tax-equivalent of $366 billion annually, or more than $4,500 per family of four, by 2015. And the annual costs will grow after 2015. [ Read full MIT study ]

The Kyoto Protocol would have imposed an equivalent tax of over $300 billion a year, 10 times the size of the Clinton-Gore tax increase of 1993. In addition to the MIT study, a new Congressional Budget Office study released recently, details how a carbon cap-and-trade system would result in massive wealth redistribution from the poor and working class to wealthier Americans. [ Read more on CBO study ]

Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), EPW Ranking Member, said today: “Carbon caps would artificially and needlessly raise the cost of energy the most on the people least able to afford it. It astounds me that any Senator could support such a proposal.”

Read Senator Inhofe’s full opening statement from today’s EPW subcommittee hearing [ Link ]

High price for load of hot air
In one of the more expensive ironies of history, the expenditure of more than $60 billion on research into global warming since 1990 has failed to demonstrate any human-caused climate trend, let alone a dangerous one.Yet that expenditure will pale into insignificance compared with the squandering of money that is going to accompany the introduction of a carbon trading or taxation system.READ MORE HERE

Books:

“The Father of the Science of Modern Climatology.” Reid Bryson is The Faithful Heretic

Probability of Sudden Global Cooling - 94% as we have reached the end of our Inter-Glacial Period
The attached data is well known and was derived mathematically by Quinn et al. in 1991 and it shows the effect of orbital geometry on solar forcing or insolation, and displays global climate as glaciation data on the same time scale. What seems to have been overlooked is the remarkable degree of correlation between insolation (shown in yellow) and sudden changes in global climate which are reflected in the glaciation data.A close review of the attached data shows that over the past 400KY there have been 18 down cycles in insolation and these correlate with 17 sudden downturns in global temperature. We have a rapid decline in insolation now. The data also clearly shows the nominal 100KY cycle for glaciation and the interglacial phases and it shows that we have reached the end of the typical Interglacial cycle and are due for a sudden cooling climate change. (See top chart in this section)http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Probability_of_Sudde n_Global_Cooling.pdf
F U N F A C T S about Global Warming
- Global surface temperatures have increased only about 0.6°C in the last 100 years but high quality satellite measurements show ~0.3deg;C( IPCC )
- Global average sea level has risen only about 6 inches in the last 100 years. (Based on tidal guage data) ( IPCC )
- Global mean sea level rise is in the range of 1.0 to 2.0 mm/yr. (Based on tidal guage data) ( IPCC )
- No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected. ( IPCC )
- 20 feet of sea level rise would take 3048-6096 years. (Based on tidal guage data) ( IPCC )
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere have risen by about 30% (280-370 ppmv) over the past 100 years. ( IPCC )
- Ice core records show Carbon Dioxide (CO2) levels lag behind Temperature changes by hundreds of years. ( Source )
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is only about 0.038% of the atmosphere. ( NASA )
- Carbon Dioxide accounts for about 4.2-8.4% of the greenhouse effect. ( Source )
- Humans can only claim responsibility for about 3.4% of carbon dioxide emitted to the atmosphere annually. ( Source )
- Water Vapor + Clouds account for about 90-95% of the greenhouse effect. ( Source ) ( NASA )
- Global temperature has averaged only 57°F in the last 100 years. ( NOAA )
- The warmest year in the United States was 1934. ( NASA )

* Anthropogenic (man-made) Global Warming is an unproven Theory.
* There is no "scientific consensus" that global warming will cause catastrophic climate change.
* Science is not determined by "consensus" but by the Scientific Method.

The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource

Heroes:

DISCLAIMER: I am NOT affiliated With any organization or paid! I WILL NOT TOLLERATE SPAM, PERSONAL ATTACKS OR OTHER OFFENSIVE COMMENTS, THANK YOU.
At the very heart of the IPCC's calculations lurks a very large error. The IPCC says: "The CO2 radiative forcing increased by 20 percent during the last 10 years (1995-2005)." Radiative forcing quantifies increases in radiant energy in the atmosphere, and hence in temperature. The atmospheric concentration of CO2 in 1995 was 360 parts per million. In 2005 it was just 5% higher, at 378 ppm. But each additional molecule of CO2 in the air causes a smaller radiant-energy increase than its predecessor. So the true increase in radiative forcing was 1 percent, not 20 percent. The IPCC has exaggerated the CO2 effect 20-fold.

Why so large and crucial an exaggeration? Answer: the IPCC has repealed the fundamental physical the Stefan-Boltzmann equation - that converts radiant energy to temperature. Without this equation, no meaningful calculation of the effect of radiance on temperature can be done. Yet the 1,600 pages of the IPCC's 2007 report do not mention it once. The IPCC knows of the equation, of course. But it is inconvenient. It imposes a strict (and very low) limit on how much greenhouse gases can increase temperature. At the Earth's surface, you can add as much greenhouse gas as you like (the "surface forcing"), and the temperature will scarcely respond. That is why all of the IPCC's computer models predict that 10km above Bali, in the tropical upper troposphere, temperature should be rising two or three times as fast as it does at the surface. Without that tropical upper-troposphere "hot-spot", the Stefan-Boltzmann law ensures that surface temperature cannot change much. For half a century we have been measuring the temperature in the upper atmosphere - and it has been changing no faster than at the surface. The IPCC knows this, too. So it merely declares that its computer predictions are right and the real-world measurements are wrong. Next time you hear some scientifically-illiterate bureaucrat say, "The science is settled", remember this vital failure of real-world observations to confirm the IPCC's computer predictions. The IPCC's entire case is built on a guess that the absent hot-spot might exist. Even if the Gore/IPCC exaggerations were true, which they are not, the economic cost of trying to mitigate climate change by trying to cut our emissions through carbon trading and other costly market interferences would far outweigh any possible climatic benefit.Joe Bastardi
Expert Senior Forecaster at AccuWeather, and he is heard daily on a number of radio stations. His daily weather column is the most extensive in the business and has helped establish him, along with his videos, as the internet's go-to guy for long-range and hurricane forecasting. He is also the one who first opened my eyes to the many facits of long range forcasting. "The key to this is understanding and using the past as tools for 'clues' about the future climate, not just computer models. A one sided approach to something as complex and chaotic as our atmosphere is a recipe for dissaster."
Dr. Vincent Gray , Expert Reviewer for the IPCC and author of The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of 'Climate Change 2001', Wellington, New Zealand
, Ph.D., is a pioneer in the science of forecasting hurricanes. William M. Gray pioneered the concept of "seasonal" hurricane forecasting — predicting months in advance the severity of the coming hurricane season. Gray's prognostications, issued since 1983, are used by insurance companies to calculate premiums. He is Emeritus Professor of Atmospheric Science at Colorado State University (CSU), and head of the Tropical Meteorology Project at CSU's Department of Atmospheric Sciences. Gray is noted for his forecasts of Atlantic hurricane season activity. Professor Gray served as a weather forecaster for the United States Air Force , and as a research assistant in the University of Chicago Department of Meteorology. He joined Colorado State University in 1961. He has been advisor of over 70 Ph. D. and M. Sc. students. His team has been issuing seasonal hurricane forecasts since 1984. After the 2005 Atlantic hurricane season , Gray cited that he was devoting more time to the issue of global warming . Gray said "They've been brainwashing us for 20 years, starting with the nuclear winter and now with the global warming. This scare will also run its course. In 15-20 years, we'll look back and see what a hoax this was." Gray also stated, "I'll take on any scientist in this field to talk about this,I predict that in 5 to 8 years the globe will begin to cool". “Al Gore is one of these guys that preaches the end of the world type of things. I think he's doing a great disservice and he doesn't know what he's talking about.”
Lord Monckton,
a former policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher during her years as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, said, "A careful study of the substantial corpus of peer-reviewed science reveals that Mr. Gore's film, An Inconvenient Truth, is a foofaraw of pseudo-science, exaggerations, and errors, now being peddled to innocent schoolchildren worldwide. Monckton calls on the former Vice President to "step up to the plate and defend his advocacy of policies that could do grave harm to the welfare of the world's poor. If Mr. Gore really believes global warming is the defining issue of our time, the greatest threat human civilization has ever faced, then he should welcome the opportunity to raise the profile of the issue before a worldwide audience of billions by defining and defending his claims against a serious, science-based challenge."
Dr. Timothy F. Ball ,
Former Lead Author IPCC, an environmental consultant, well-known public speaker and former professor of climatology at the University of Winnipeg will serve as NRSP’s Chairman as well as Chair of the NRSP Scientific Advisory Committee.
"Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the only one trying to make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was the first Canadian Ph.D. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology, especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human history and the human condition. Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science) from the University of London, England and that for 32 years I was a Professor of Climatology at the University of Winnipeg. For some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening. Here is why. Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification."
Dr. Richard S. Lindzen, USA He is a former Lead Author IPCC, an atmospheric physicist and a professor of meteorology at MIT, renowned for his research in dynamic meteorology - especially atmospheric waves. He is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences and has held positions at the University of Chicago, Harvard University and MIT. Linzen frequently speaks out against the notion that significant Global Warming is caused by humans. As Lindzen said many years ago: "the consensus was reached before the research had even begun. Now, any scientist who dares to question the prevailing wisdom is marginalized and called a sceptic, when in fact they are simply being good scientists. This has reached frightening levels with these scientists now being called climate change denier with all the holocaust connotations of that word. The normal scientific method is effectively being thwarted."
Dr. Theodor Landscheidt
of the Schroeter Institute for Research in Cycles of Solar Activity in Waldmuenchen, Germany."Contrary to the IPCC's speculation about man-made global warming as high as 5.8° C within the next hundred years," said Landscheidt, a long period of cool climate with its coldest phase around 2030 is to be expected. It can be seen, added Landscheidt, that the Gleissberg minimum around 2030 and another one around 2200 will be of the Maunder minimum type accompanied by severe cooling on Earth."
Dr. Piers Corbyn
A Meterologist, Solar Physicist an astrophysicist, is the originator of the revolutionary solar weather technique of long-range forecasting and a founder of Weather Action Long Range Forecasters. His first scientific publications were on aspects of meteorology and astronomy. He also carried out astrophysics research at Queen Mary College London and published work on galaxy formation and the mean matter density of the universe. From his research into the causes of weather change, he totally rejects the carbon dioxide-based theory of global warming and climate change. Corbyn is one of the scientists featured in the wagTV film-produced "The Great Global Warming Swindle," shown on Channel 4 in Britain in March. In a letter to the U.K. Govt "I ask you to campaign to redress the present one-sided political climate on this matter and campaign for C4's 'The Great Global Warming Swindle' to be circulated to all schools in the same way that the Government has agreed to circulate Al Gore's brainwashing movie."
Dr. Ian Clark
Professor, Department of Earth Sciences (arctic specialist) Isotope Hydrogeology and Paleoclimatology University of Ottawa Ottawa, CA The role of solar activity on climate warming has been observed in real data sets collected at many different time scales. All are consistent in showing a relationship between changes in solar activity and temperature. Before spending futile billions on Kyoto implementation measures, perhaps we should pay more attention to the role that the sun plays. We know that it was responsible for climate change in the past, and so is clearly going to play the lead role in present and future climate change. And interestingly... solar activity has recently begun a downward cycle.
Dr. John Cristy
Lead Author IPCC, Professor and Director Earth System Science Center, NSSTC University of Alabama in Huntsville PhD University of Illinois, 1987, Atmospheric Science M.S. University of Illinois, 1984, Atmospheric Science M.Div. Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary, 1978 B.A. California State University, Fresno, 1973, Mathematics "I've often heard it said that there is a consensus of thousands of scientists on the global warming issue, that humans are causing a catastrophic change to the climate system. Well, I am one scientist - and there are many - that simply think that is not true."
The Late John L. Daly
Originally from Britain, I came to live in Tasmania in 1980, settling near Launceston, and for the last 9 years have been one of the numerous ..skeptics' speaking out publicly against the Global Warming scare, which makes exaggerated claims that the earth will warm by +1.5 to +6 deg. C. due to an enhanced Greenhouse Effect. Climate and climate change has been a lifelong study of mine since my early days as a ship's officer in the British Merchant Navy. I have lived through and traced the progress of the ..ice age' scare of the 1970's, the ..nuclear winter' scare of the 1980s, and now the ..global warming' scare of the present. All these scares have advanced the interests of what was a small academic discipline 30 years ago to become a mammoth global industry today. It is my view that this industry has, through the ..politics of fear' which it has promoted, acted against the interests of the public.
Read more about John Daly here: http://www.john-daly.com/dalybio.htm
Patrick J. Michaels
Former author & reviewer & senior fellow in environmental studies at the Cato Institute and professor of natural resources at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. He is a past president of the American Association of State Climatologists." The Kyoto Protocol will have no discernible effect on global climate--in fact, it is doubtful that the current network of surface thermometers could distinguish a change on the order of .19 degree from normal year-to-year variations. The Kyoto Protocol will result in no demonstrable climate change but easily demonstrable economic damage."
Patrick Moore, Ph.D.
Dr. Patrick Moore has been a leader in the international environmental field for over 30 years. He is a founding member of Greenpeace and served for nine years as President of Greenpeace Canada and seven years as a Director of Greenpeace International. As the leader of many campaigns Dr. Moore was a driving force shaping policy and direction while Greenpeace became the world's largest environmental activist organization. In recent years, Dr. Moore has been focused on the promotion of sustainability and consensus building among competing concerns. He was a member of British Columbia government-appointed Round Table on the Environment and Economy from 1990 - 1994. In 1990, Dr. Moore founded and chaired the BC Carbon Project, a group that worked to develop a common understanding of climate change Dr. Moore served for four years as Vice President, Environment for Waterfurnace International, the largest manufacturer of geothermal heat pumps for residential heating and cooling with renewable earth energy. As Chair of the Sustainable Forestry Committee of the Forest Alliance of BC, he leads the process of developing the "Principles of Sustainable Forestry" which have been adopted by a majority of the industry. In 1991 Dr. Moore founded Greenspirit, a consultancy focusing on environmental policy and communications in natural resources, biodiversity, energy and climate change In 2000, Dr. Moore published Green Spirit - Trees are the Answer, a photo-book that provides a new insight into how forests work and how they can play a powerful role in solving many of our current environmental problems. “There were always extreme, irrational and mystical elements within our movement, but they tended to be kept in their place during the early years. Then in the mid-Eighties the ultraleftists and extremists took over. After Greenham Common closed and the Berlin Wall came down these extremists were searching for a new cause and found it in environmentalism. The old agendas of class struggle and anti-corporatism are still there but now they are dressed up in environmental terminology.”Senator James Inhofe
Ranking member of the minority Republican party on U.S. Senate Commitee on Environment & Public Works.MY WIFE = MY HERO
All our troops, the brave men and women in our armed forces! All of the courageous people from the 911 Terrorist attack that have died, lost loved ones and still suffering today. Any so-called '911 truthers' out there are only causing more harm with their pathetic conspiracy theories that only further the confusion and are helping further devide the USA with absolutely no justification or basis in reality! Just some doctored up photos, videos and celebrities that prove nothing...none of were there...really sad and dangerous
Looks like they forgot to add alot..but you get the picture...Add in CMP/MPS & you get a taste of what it's like to be me...invisible my ass!