David writes bad tv shows, David writes inane comic books, David writes lame movies, David's a washed up stand-up, David's a big fat jerk who needs to shut his yap.
The public, meanwhile, is thoroughly convinced that the Dems are not seeking impeachment and, looking at the polls, it seems to take a dim view of that position. But, even now, the time in not quite right for opening impeachment hearings.First we must exhaust the possible remedies for compelling the information we seek. The first thing that will happen is that the full House Judiciary committee will vote to find Harriet Miers in contempt of Congress. Then the whole House will vote to find her in contempt of Congress. They may also find Karl Rove, Josh Bolten, Sara Taylor, and others in contempt of Congress, but let's keep this simple for now.Once Miers is found in contempt, the House has a decision to make. John Dean does a pretty good rundown on the options, risks, and likely outcomes. Basically, the House has three main options. Ordinarily, they would have the US Attorney for the District of Columbia impanel a grand jury. The grand jury would quickly indict Miers and charges would be brought. But the US Attorney works for Alberto Gonzales and his department has already advised that Miers does not have to comply with the subpoena. So, this is not an option that will provide relief.A second option is to, as Dean says, 'institute a civil legal action by seeking declaratory judgment from a federal court to compel enforcement of their subpoena.' But this is also unlikely to bring relief. First, it would be a lengthy process that would let the administration run out the clock. Second, if the courts sided with the administration it would permanently weaken the legislative branch of government.The third option is radical, but is completely justified under the circumstances. Dean:Finally, if Miers is found in contempt, the House itself can take action against her at the bar of the House. (The Senate can similarly hold such proceedings.) Congress has the power to prosecute contumacious witnesses to require them to comply, and the Supreme Court has repeatedly reaffirmed this power. For example, in 1987, in Young v. U.S., Justice Antonin Scalia recognized "the narrow principle of necessity" or "self-defense" of the Congress in protecting its institutional prerogatives. Scalia said "the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branches must each possess those powers necessary to protect the functioning of its own processes, although those implicit powers may take a form that appears to be nonlegislative, nonexecutive, or nonjudicial, respectively." The technical term for this is Inherent Contempt. Congress hasn't used this power since 1934 and it would be a spectacle. The Congress would have the sergeant-at-arms arrest Harriet Miers and then she would face a trial in the House. The Department of Justice would not be involved. Inherent Contempt can be invoked in either house of Congress, so the Senate could do the same thing to Sara Taylor if they so desired. In the 1934 case the Senate convicted the postmaster general to 10 days in prison. He appealed it all the way to the Supreme Court and lost.This is the beginning point to impeaching the president. Bringing Inherent Contempt charges against Miers will provide the kind of exotic storyline that will crystallize the extreme crisis that we are in for the public.Dean made a point about the administration's strategy:By not responding to the subpoena, the President and Ms. Miers all but invited the House Judiciary Committee and, in turn, the House of Representatives to vote to deem her in contempt of Congress. It was a defiant, in-your-face insult to Congress. No president would do this unless he was quite confident of the outcome. Clearly, Bush's White House and Justice Department lawyers believe that the solidly conservative federal judiciary will grant them a favorable ruling, and that, in the process, they will greatly weaken congressional oversight powers, to the advantage of the White House. In short, the Bush White House is not bluffing with this act of defiance. Rather, the White House truly wants to test, and attempt to expand, presidential power.But they didn't count on Inherent Contempt. They didn't count on Congress standing up for themselves and using their own police and their own jail and their own court.It is only when the battle becomes clearly a battle, not between parties, but between branches of government, that the Republicans will stand up and remove a president that they really have no use for. They won't remove him for torture, or illegal spying, or kidnapping, or voter fraud, but they'll consider it for usurping the powers of Congress. And if the president is going to stay the course in Iraq, they may well compel him to turn over the ..s that will seal his fate.“President Clinton is once again releasing American military might on a foreign country with an ill-defined objective and no exit strategy. He has yet to tell the Congress how much this operation will cost. And he has not informed our nation’s armed forces about how long they will be away from home. These strikes do not make for a sound foreign policy.â€-Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) NEW BUMPER STICKERS
1) (On an infant's shirt): Already Smarter Than BUSH
2) 1/20/09: End of an Error
3) That's OK, I Wasn't Using My Civil Liberties Anyway
4) Let's Fix Democracy in This Country FIRST!
5) If You Want a Nation Ruled By Religion, Move to Iran
6) BUSH--Like a Rock. Only Dumber.
7) You Can't Be Pro-War And Pro-Life At The Same Time
8) If You Can Read This, You're Not Our President
9) Of Course It Hurts: You're Getting Screwed by an Elephant
10) Hey, Bush Supporters: Embarrassed Yet?
11) George Bush: Creating the Terrorists Our Kids Will Have to Fight
12) IMPEACHMENT: It's Not Just for Blowjobs Anymore
13) America : One Nation, Under Surveillance
14) They Call Him "W" So He Can Spell It
15) Which God Do You Kill For?
16) Cheney/Satan '08
17) JAIL to the Chief
18) Who Would Jesus Torture?
19) No, Seriously, Why Did We Invade?
20) Bush: God's Way of Proving Intelligent Design Is Full Of Crap
21) Bad president! No Banana.
22) We Need a President Who's Fluent In English
23) We're Making Enemies Faster Than We Can Kill Them
24) Is It Vietnam Yet?
25) Bush Doesn't Care About The White People, Either
26) Where Are We Going? And Why Are We In This Handbasket?
27) Frodo Failed. Bush Has the Ring.
28) Impeach Cheney First
29) The Republican Party: Our Bridge to the 11th Century
My newest film
Bush Competing For Most Unpopular President In Modern Polling History President Bush is a competitive guy. But this is one contest he would rather lose. With 18 months left in office, he is in the running for most unpopular president in the history of modern polling.The latest Washington Post-ABC News survey shows that 65 percent of Americans disapprove of Bush's job performance, matching his all-time low. In polls conducted by The Post or Gallup going back to 1938, only once has a president exceeded that level of public animosity -- and that was Richard M. Nixon, who hit 66 percent four days before he resigned.====================================Add my NEW site, it's all politics all the time.
CLICK HERE
HALIBURTON "LOST" 1.4 BILLION IN CASH IN IRAQ.
JUST VANISHED. YET THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESS
SAYS THAT'S OKAY...WE'RE AT WAR, IT DOESN'T MATTER.
I've done stand up...I've written movies...I've written for tv...I've done comic books...but now I face my greatest challenge. I'm going to fight crime. No, not the bank robbers...what the fuck do I care, it's not my money. I mean the real criminals. Those crazy white boys with backwards baseball caps, no belt for their baggy pants, and a ghetto accent. The cashiers at Piggly Wiggly who allow people with 30 items in the 10 items line. R. Kelly...you just can't be pissing on anybody willy nilly! That negro crazy. I got me a costume from The Superhero Collection....it's a sweet dark blue with an orange fringe and a yellow cape. It's sweet. And I'll have my justice upon those whom I deem a fool. For I shall now and ever be...The Fool Smasher! Other than that.... I'm afraid of Virginia Woolf.I subscribe to Truthiness as often as possible.I subscribe to the whole "friends with benefits" movement! That's so cool.I subscribe to Cat Fancy, yet I don't fancy cats.Joe Franklin never touched me in a bad place (that I can legally claim).Favorite tv line: "Hey, I'm Ant-Man. I can shrink down to the size of an ant but retaining my normal human strength!" ----Garrett Morris, SNLNo, I have not seen Debra Messing naked...but I'm bidding my time. She'll need money soon. She's got a mortgage.WTF...you know what I just noticed? The girls went to bed two hours ago and I'm still watching the Disney Channel. Damn you, Phil Of The Future, damn you to hell!! I'm watching The Suite Life Of Zack & Cody more than Michael Jackson. What else about this man who would be Matlock? Well, he loves to cook. He's never been to England or Ireland. He often pontificates about the differences and similarities between MaryAnn and Ginger. Has only cheated on his taxes twice. Voted for his damn self in the last election. Loves quirky bizarre movies, comics, Jodie Foster's biggest fan, I9 paperwork, laughs, he reads Justic League comics in his Aquaman underwear, he's a celebrity whore, he used to eat White Castle cheeseburgers by the truckload (but these days onions give him gas), Albert Brooks is his God, he loves rare-medium ribeye steaks, all the movies they mocked on Mystery Science Theatre, superhero wrist watches, banana taffy, smiling faces and sushi. And you...he really loves you too, you know. Won't you love him too?