The Commonwealth Coalition profile picture

The Commonwealth Coalition

About Me

Official Commonwealth Coalition MySpace


What is the Marshall/Newman amendment and why should you Vote NO?

BALLOT QUESTION NUMBER 1
Question: Shall Article I (the Bill of Rights) of the Constitution of Virginia be amended to state:

    "That only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this Commonwealth and its political subdivisions.
    This Commonwealth and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage. Nor shall this Commonwealth or its political subdivisions create or recognize another union, partnership, or other legal status to which is assigned the rights, benefits, obligations, qualities, or effects of marriage."?

The Right answer is NO

What is The Commonwealth Coalition?

The Commonwealth Coalition ("The Coalition") is a diverse group of individuals, businesses, and civic, community and religious organizations who have joined together to oppose the proposed amendment to the Virginia bill of rights that will be on the ballot this fall on election day, NOvember 7, 2006. The Marshall/Newman amendment would add to our constitution language that would go well beyond prohibiting same sex marriage to prohibit any and all legal recognition of unmarried relationships, gay or straight.


"Burning" - The Coalition Ad: Watch it. Share it.


Copy and paste this code into your profile to say you will VOTE NO!

Ten Reasons to Vote NO


1. You believe that the language of the proposed amendment goes too far in denying legal recognition to all unmarried relationships and not just same-sex relationships.
2. You are concerned that the amendment will be read by the courts to bar enforcement of domestic violence laws against unmarried partners.
3. You are concerned that the amendment will be used by opposing factions in families seeking to deny unmarried partners of loved ones the right to hospital visitation, to decide about organ donation or burial or to determine guardianship of children or property rights.
4. You are a business person or business owner who is concerned that your business will be sued for offering domestic partner benefits or health insurance to other than immediate family members or that you will not be able to attract and retain the best employees because you will not be able to match benefits available elsewhere.
5. You believe that civil marriage, as a governmental benefit, should be available to all without discrimination.
6. You are a religious leader or member of a faith community concerned that the amendment will prohibit you from celebrating marriages or unions consistent with your faith.
7. You are in an unmarried relationship, and you are concerned that the amendment may deny you access to the courts to enforce legal agreements regarding child custody, property and other arrangements essential to provide stability for your relationship and your family.
8. You believe that it is unnecessary to amend the constitution because Virginia statutes have prohibited same-sex marriages for 30 years and civil unions and other legal agreements between same-sex couples for the last three years without any legal challenge.
9. You believe that marriage should be limited to one man and one woman, and civil unions, domestic partnerships and other legal agreements between unmarried gay or straight couples should be legal.
10. You support full marriage equality.

My Interests

I'd like to meet:



My Blog

EV Alert: Thank You and Upcoming Town Hall Meetings

  November 8, 2006   Dear Friends,   I have a lot of mixed emotions today.   Heartbroken about the outcome of the amendment, but so proud of everyone who got engaged an...
Posted by The Commonwealth Coalition on Thu, 09 Nov 2006 03:54:00 PST

Commonwealth Coalition Regrets Loss

Thanks Virginians Who Took A Stand Against Discrimination November 7, 2006 (Richmond, Virginia) Speaking on behalf of The Commonwealth Coalition, campaign manager, Claire Guthrie GastaƱaga, released ...
Posted by The Commonwealth Coalition on Wed, 08 Nov 2006 04:11:00 PST

Prominent Republicans Announce Opposition to Ballot Question .1

Criticize Amendment as "Mean Spirited," "Embarrassing," and a "Repudiation of Basic Republican Principles" (Richmond, Virginia) In a telephone press conference sponsored by The Commonwealth Coali...
Posted by The Commonwealth Coalition on Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:57:00 PST

280 CLERGY ANNOUNCE OPPOSITION TO BALLOT QUESTION .1

Concerned about Effect on Families, Clergy Urge Virginians to Vote No RICHMOND  Two hundred and eighty clergy from across Virginia released a signed statement announcing their opposition to ...
Posted by The Commonwealth Coalition on Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:57:00 PST

Health Care Professionals Are Voting NO on Ballot Question .1

Psychiatrists and Pediatricians Agree Passage of Proposed Amendment Would Harm Virginians and Especially Children (Richmond, Virginia) Last week, two organizations representing health care professio...
Posted by The Commonwealth Coalition on Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:07:00 PST

Richmond Times Dispatch Says NO on Ballot Question .1

In a lengthy editorial published this morning, the conservative Richmond Times Dispatch opined: "On this amendment, as written, we incline against." The editorial asks two questions: is the amend...
Posted by The Commonwealth Coalition on Mon, 30 Oct 2006 03:29:00 PST

Concerned About Harm to Children in Unmarried Relationships  Pediatricians Will be Voting NO

At a press conference in Richmond today, the Virginia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics came out against Ballot Question #1 pointing out the importance of stable families to all child...
Posted by The Commonwealth Coalition on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:36:00 PST

Governor Doug Wilder Joins Those Voting NO on NOvember 7th

Governor Wilder said for the first time yesterday that he opposes Ballot Question #1. The Richmond Times Dispatch reported this morning that Wilder opposes the amendment because it would interfer...
Posted by The Commonwealth Coalition on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:35:00 PST

Unmarried Domestic Violence Victims Threatened by Passage of Ballot Question .1

Ohio Attorney Urges Virginia Voters to Learn from Ohio's Experience and Vote NO (Richmond, Virginia) Domestic violence advocates, survivors and defense counsel agreed at a press conference today ...
Posted by The Commonwealth Coalition on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:36:00 PST

New Jersey Decision Is A Decision for New Jersey That Reflects New Jersey's History and Policy

Virginia Law Unaffected The Commonwealth Coalition issued the following statement today in response to the decision of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Lewis, et al v. Harris: The decision in New ...
Posted by The Commonwealth Coalition on Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:29:00 PST