Vasilescu profile picture

Vasilescu

val2002

About Me


Myspace Layouts
Myspace Codes
Myspace Generators
Myspace BackgroundsEDUCATION"Aurel Vlaicu" Air Force Officers' School;Academy of High Military Studies, military science;National War College;EXPERIENCEMilitary pilot's licence for supersonic aircraft MIG-21; ATC air traffic controller's licence/instructor's training; Specialisation in airport management and crisis management following terrorist attacks (training course in Dublin - 1998) NEGOTIATOR ;PROFESSIONALS ACTIVITIES :Profession: officer, Ministry of National Defence ; MIG-21 pilot;Assistant commander of International Bucharest Otopeni Airport;Member of Parliament - deputy; member of the Committee for Defence, Public Order, and National Security;ABILITIESListen and watch no more speaking, making noise.

My Interests

I'd like to meet:

ROMANIAN
PE CINE AS DORI SA CUNOSC? Pe cei care prin faptele si realizarile lor pot argumenta ca opinia exprimata de Katlin Desgraviers in iulie 1995 este eronata :
“Romanul ocupa in cadrul umanitatii un loc mai aparte : el se caracterizeaza prin faptul ca nu stie ce vrea si face de cele mai multe ori lucrurile la care se pricepe cel mai putin. Frica de a nu avea mereu dreptate l-a stapinit mereu incat sa-l opreasca din calea solidarizarii cu individul de aceasi natie aflat in afirmare. Romanii nu stiu sa lupte pentru apararea sau impunerea opiniei lor, ci doar pentru infirmarea parerii celuilalt, dupa care se refugiaza in folclor.
De aceea romanii nu s-au afirmat niciodata la nivel de ratiune; au asteptat sa-i afirme mereu altii si altii. Abia in momentul in care altii au dovedit ca respectivul roman a avut dreptate si folosesc deja idea lui, multimea de romani izbucneste : “Ti-am spus eu!!!” Romanul isi traieste si el viata; trece ca un ciine printre picioarele ursului, fara sa-l muste: “Iaca, si eu p-aci, imi apar saracia, nevoile si neamul.”
Romania ca entitate a facut din masochism o virtute. Faptul de a fi mereu chinuita, de a fi mereu palmuita si batjocorita este trait la nivel de paroxism apocaliptic. Orice lovitura este considerata ca facind parte din destinul ei. Romania n-a inteles ca EA isi creaza destinul prin romanasii ei, iar resemnarea in fata destinului este de fapt o resemnare in fata realitatii, pentru care a optat si pe care singura si-a construit-o.
Totusi, destinul nu este o piesa de muzeu, expusa pentru a fi privita din toate unghiurile, fara a i se aduce vreo corectie. Romanul incearca sa se afirme mereu ca un “EU SUNT” si nu ca un “EU DEVIN”, fixindu-si obiective, trecind prag dupa prag si deschizind porti dupa porti. Nu exista devenire statica, grecescul “STATOS” insemnind stationar, si romanul incearca de sute de ani sa-l nuanteze, sa se scuze parca. Static, “EU SUNT” nu inseamna nici macar miscare foarte, foarte lenta : el inseamna pur si simplu OPRIRE, negare a miscarii de orice fel.
Si in oprire nu exista nici macar un grad (fie el infinitesimal) de miscare. Daca romanul ar vrea sa gindeasca responsabil la soarta sa si a semenilor sai, am putea vorbi de miscare. Dar vrea el asta ? Concluzionind,romanul arata cam asa : un Iosif biblic ce stie sa accepte fara comentarii voia CELUI CEL MARE.”
Fiecare e liber sa-si aleaga calea de urmat. Unii reusesc sa razbata si demonstreaza ca este posibil sa te ridici deasupra mlastinii care te inconjoara. Si sunt un altfel de repere, exemple demne de urmat, pentru cei ce doresc asa ceva. Altii, se complac sa fie mereu asimilati cu marasmul indus de multitudinea de rebuturi umane, in voga azi pretutindeni. Intrebarea mea este: TU CE ALEGI?
ENGLISH
WHOM WOULD I LIKE TO MEET? Those who through their deeds and achievements can argue that Katlin Desgraviers’ opinion expressed in 1995 is wrong:
“The Romanian occupies a singular place within the framework of humanity: he is characterized by the fact that he doesn’t know what he wants and does, for the most part, the things for which he is least skilled. The fear of always not being right has always suppressed him and, in that way, stopped him from fraternizing with those co-nationals who are pro-active. Romanians don’t know how to fight for defending or enforcing their opinions, but only for attacking the opinions of others, and then they take refuge in folklore.
That is why Romanians never distinguished themselves at a rational level; they always waited for others and others to distinguish them. Only when the others proved that the Romanian in question was right and they are already using his idea, the whole lot of Romanians burst out loud: “I told you!!!” The Romanian lives his own life; he passes like a dog between the bear’s legs, without biting him: “Here I am! I am defending my poverty, my needs and my people.”
Romania as an entity made masochism a virtue. The events of always being tortured, slapped and mocked are lived at a level of apocalyptic paroxysm. Every hit is considered as being part of her destiny. Romania didn’t understand that SHE creates her own destiny through her own little Romanians, and resigning herself to destiny is in fact a resignation in the face of reality, which she herself chose and built.
However, fate is not a museum piece, exposed so that it can be watched from all angles, without any criticism. The Romanian always tries to affirm himself with a “I AM” and not with a “I BECOME”, thereby setting objectives, passing threshold after threshold and opening door after door. There is no static formation, the Greek “STATOS”, meaning stationary, and the Romanian has been trying for hundreds of years to give new shades of meaning to it, almost to the point of excuse. The static “I AM” doesn’t even mean very, very slow movement: it simply means STAGNATION, a negation of all types of movement.
And in stagnation there is not even a degree (be it infinitessimal) of movement. If the Romanian were to think about his and his people’s fate in a responsible manner, we could talk about movement. But does he want that? In conclusion, the Romanian looks a bit like this: a Biblical Joseph who knows how to accept unconditionally the will of GOD.”
Everyone is free to choose his/her own way in life. Some succeed in pulling through and prove that it is possible for someone to raise oneself from the quagmire that surrounds oneself thereby becoming guides and examples worthy of being followed by those who desire such a thing. Others allow themselves to become assimilated with the morass induced by the multitude of human refuse, which is fashionable everywhere today. My question is: WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO CHOOSE?br
Create your own visitor map!

Television:

CEVA DESPRE MINE / SOMETHING ABOUT ME

Heroes:

a href="http://s230.photobucket.com/albums/ee82/vasilescu_albu m/il-76%20UR-UCA/?action=view&current=sch_Otp.jpg" target="_blank"a href="http://s230.photobucket.com/albums/ee82/vasilescu_albu m/tocu/?action=view&current=tocu_frincu1.jpg" target="_blank"a href="http://s230.photobucket.com/albums/ee82/vasilescu_albu m/tocu/?action=view&current=conventie2.jpg" target="_blank"