Kuno

Hey well my name is Laura and I made this page because as you already know I am the PROUD owner of a beautiful Pitbull named Kuno and I would hate for someone to just take him away from me only because of his breed. I want to make a stand against animal abuse and SB 861. This animals have already been banned in parts of the USA and Australia. This needs to be stopped! Please help make stand against this horrible law. PUNISH THE DEED, NOT THE BREEDKUNO - Hey well my name is Kuno :D I'm a blue eye (now yellow, blah) red nose pit. I'm six months old and I've been with my mommy since I was one :) I love tackling my mom and chewing her hair, its fun and she hates it :D Everytime I jump on my mom she falls and its really funny, I do it all the time, but I dont think she likes it though.I have two older brothers, Shady and Kobe, and I love teasing them, well no, not Kobe cause he's a Chihuahua and hes a bit psycho and gets mad a lot, so I just tease Shady most of the time. I'll pretty much bite anything I can get a hold on, I love digging and walking with my mom. She says she walks me but we both know its the other way around. I really hate pidgeons and the way they always poop on my yard and try to take my food. Oh and I also like to sniff everything!PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION!! GO HERE... http://www.petitiononline.com/NOBSL/ http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/257409023SB 861 was passed by the California legislature in October, 2005. Put plainly, SB 861 authorizes any California town to slowly remove from the dog population any breed of dog by allowing a town to require forced sterilization of any particular breed that they choose to target. While we believe that responsible pet owners should neuter or spay their dogs, we also believe that it is not up to a state or town to make that decision, and not on a breed-by-breed basis. In addition, having a particular breed targeted by a local law will make owning that particular breed less attractive, perhaps even intimidating (can you imagine having the police stop you every time you walk your dog so that they can inspect her belly, or look between his legs?) This of course will only hasten the town becoming free of that breed. Thus, while SB 861 claims to only be about sterilization, it truly is a law designed to help towns ban breeds.While it is true that the Dangerous Dog Breed law was passed in response to incidents in which people were injured by dogs - often by particular breeds - the answer to such incidents is to hold the owners responsible, not the breeds of dog. Irresponsible dog owners are to blame for such incidents, not the breed. It is not the particular breed's fault that certain types of dog owners choose to train them to fight, or to attack, and for every dog of a given breed that has been irresponsibly trained, there are hundreds more of that breed who are loving family pets. More to the point, for every dog of a given breed that has been irresponsibly trained, there is an irresponsible dog owner - and it is that dog owner who must be held accountable, not the dog, who is but another victim of the owner's irresponsible acts.Read more @ http://www.defeat861.com/Defeat 861, the Dangerous Dog Breed Ban Law!