Carlitos

“Who am I?” Well, I’ll leave that for you to decide, because who I am, may not be the same as who you think I may be. So, therefore, there comes no reason to answer the question “Who am I” because that implies I know what you think I am, which I do not. Thus, I know only who I think I am; but with every answer there is possibility of a wrong answer. So then, what does that entail? That I may be wrong? That I myself do not know who I think I am? This may indeed be the case, because the word “think” only implies that the conclusion of my thought for who I think I am is merely an opinion of me. However, opinions entail uncertainty. So could that mean that my opinion that you decide who I am, is in actuality a universal fallacy, which would therefore conclude that I am nothing, due to the fact that the opinion of myself is corrupted with uncertainty? Or can it mean that I simply do not know who I am and never will? However, some may say we are “thinking things”. However, we each have different thoughts to think, therefore, we are more then thinking things; because the belief that we are “thinking things” is only an opinion and an opinion may be uncertain. For this reason, I can say with the utmost uncertainty that I think I may be who you think I am, whether it be a “thinking thing” or not, your opinion is all you know. Therefore, to you I am little of myself because you fill your thought of me with uncertainty. So, shall I beg the question “who am I” when the answer lies in yourself? I am you, but then again…you are not.