Dance is an art form that links mind and body in a society that tend to view the body with distrust; an art form that celebrates process in a society that values product; an art form that in its person-to-person transmission serves as a kind of “cultural DNA,†particularly for groups who historically have been denied access to political power; an art form that empowers women in a society that tend to diminish the value of “women’s work,†and finally, an art form that affirms the essential function of kinesthetic intelligence in a culture that tends to measure knowledge in words and numbers.†Mindy Levine (1994). Widening the Circle: Towards a New Vision for Dance Education. (A report on the National Task For Dance Education.) Washington DC: Dance/USA
.. width="425" height="350" ..
http://www.tobindelcuore.com
We do not recieve wisdom. We must discover it for ourselves, after a journey throught the wilderness, which no one else can make for us, which no one can spare us. For wisdom is the point of view from which we come at last to regard the world.
'The truth of the matter I believe to be this. There is no absolute right and wrong in love, but everything depends upon the circumstances; to yield to a bad man in a bad way is wrong, but to yield to a worthy man in a right way is right. The bad man is the common or vulgar lover, who is in love with the body rather than the soul; he is not constant because what he loves is not constant; as soon as the flower of physical beauty, which is what he loves, begins to fade, he is gone “even as a dreamâ€', and all his professions and promises are as nothing. But the lover of a noble nature remains its lover for life, because the thing to which he cleaves is constant. The object of our custom then is to subject lovers to a thorough test; it encourages the lover to pursue and the beloved to flee, in order that the right kind of lover may in the end be gratified and the wrong kind eluded; it sets up a kind of competition to determine to which kind of lover and beloved respectively belong. This is the motive which lies behind our general feeling that two things are discreditable, first, to give in quickly to a lover - time, which is the best test of most things, must be allowed to elapse - and second, to give in on account of his wealth and power, either because one is frightened and cannot hold out under the hardships which he inflicts, or because one cannot resist the material and political advantages which he confers; none of these things is stable or constant, quite apart from the fact that no noble friendship can be founded up them.'