About Me
Thomas Watson was one of the most concise,
racy, illustrative, and suggestive of those eminent divines who made the Puritan age the Augustan
period of evangelical literature. There is a happy union of sound doctrine, heart-searching experience
and practical wisdom throughout all his works, and his Body of Divinity is, beyond all the rest, the most precious of the peerless works of the Puritans, useful to the student and the minister. Although Thomas Watson issued several most valuable
books, comparatively little is known of him - even the dates of his birth and death are unknown.
His writings are his best memorial; perhaps he needed no other, and therefore providence forbade
the superfluity. We shall not attempt to discover his pedigree, and, after the manner of antiquarians,
derive his family from a certain famous Wat, whose son distinguished himself in the Crusades, or
in some other insane enterprise; whether blue blood was in his veins or no is of small consequence,
since we know that he was the seed-royal of the redeemed of the Lord. Some men are their own
ancestors, and, for ought we know, Thomas Watson’s genealogy reflected no fame upon him, but
derived all its lustre from his achievements.
He had the happiness to be educated at Emmanuel
College, Cambridge, which in those days deserved to be called the School of Saints, the nursing
mother of gigantic evangelical divines. In Kennet’s ‘Register and Chronicle,’ is a list of eighty-seven
names of Puritan ministers, including many well-known and loved as preachers and commentators;
such as Anth. Burgess, W. Jenkyn, Ralph Venning, Thomas Brooks, T. White, Samuel Slater,
Thomas Watson, John Rowe, Dr. W. Bates, Stephen Charnock, Samuel Clarke, Nathaniel Vincent,
Dr John Collings, William Bridge, Samuel Hildersam, Adoniram Bifield, followed by this remark,
‘These are most of them mentioned in the list of sufferers for Nonconformity, and appear upon the
registers to have been all of Emmanuel College, beside great numbers, no doubt of the same society,
who were forward preachers up of the unhappy changes of 1641,’ etc. In the margin of the book is
the following observation on the foregoing: ‘It may not be improper to observe how much young
students, in both Universities, fell in with the prejudices of their governors and tutors. This was the
reason that this single College of Emmanuel, in Cambridge, bred more of the Puritans and
Nonconformists than perhaps any seven of the other Colleges or Halls in either University.†Such
a fact as this should attract the prayers of all believers to our seminaries for the sons of the prophets,
since upon the manner in which these institutions are conducted will depend under God the future
well-being of our churches.
We are not at all surprised to learn that Thomas Watson enjoyed the repute, while at Cambridge,
of being a most laborious student; the great Puritanic authors must have been most industrious
workers at the university, or they never would have become such pre-eminent masters in Israel.
The conscientious student is the most likely man to become a successful preacher. After completing
his course with honour, Watson became rector of St Stephen’s, Walbrook, where in the very heart
of London he executed for nearly sixteen years the office of a faithful pastor with great diligence
and assiduity. Happy were the citizens who regularly attended so instructive and spiritual a ministry.
The church was constantly filled, for the fame and popularity of the preacher were deservedly great.
Going in and out among his flock, fired with holy zeal for their eternal welfare, his years rolled on
4
A Body of Divinity Thomas Watson
pleasantly enough amid the growing respect of all who knew him. Calamy, in his Nonconformist
Memorial, says of him: - ‘He was so well known in the city for his piety and usefulness, that though
he was singled out by the Friendly Debate, he yet carried a general respect from all sober persons
along with him to his grave. He was a man of considerable reaming, a popular, but judicious preacher
(if one may judge from his writings), and eminent in the gift of prayer. Of this, the following
anecdote is a sufficient proof. Once on a lecture day, before the Bartholomew Act took place, the
learned Bishop Richardson came to hear him at St Stephen’s, who was much pleased with his
sermon, but especially with his prayer after it, so that he followed him home to give him thanks,
and earnestly desired a copy of his prayer. “Alas!†(said Mr Watson) “that is what I cannot give,
for I do not use to pen my prayers; it was no studied thing, but uttered, pro re nata, as God enabled
me, from the abundance of my heart and affections.†Upon which the good Bishop went away
wondering that any man could pray in that manner extempore.
But the hand which of old had oppressed the church was again stretched forth to vex certain of
the saints. The most learned, holy, and zealous of the clergy of the Church of England found that
the Act of Uniformity would not allow them to preserve a clean conscience and retain their livings,
and therefore they submitted to the loss of all things for Christ’s sake. Thomas Watson did not
hesitate as to the course he should pursue. He was not a factious hater of royalty, a red republican,
or fifth monarchy-man; in fact, he had in Cromwell’s day been all too loyal to the house of Stuart;
he had protested against the execution of the King, and had joined in Love’s plot for the bringing
in of Charles II; yet all this availed nothing, he was a Puritan, and therefore must not be tolerated
by the bitter spirits then dominant in the Establishment. What seeds of discord were sown on that
black Bartholomew history has not had space to record; yet the ultimate results have been fraught
with results scarcely then imaginable. Comprehension might have hindered truth; the crown rights
of King Jesus might have lacked advocates had monarchs and priests been more tolerant; as it was
good men were forced into a truer position than they would otherwise have occupied, and the
beginning of a real reformation was inaugurated. From that commencement in suffering what
progress has been made! Every day the cause of the ejected gathers force and pushes on its adversary
towards the brink of the precipice, a down which all establishments must fall.
With many tears and lamentations the congregation of St Stephen’s saw their shepherd about
to be removed from his flock, and with aching hearts they listened to his parting words. He himself
speaking as one bereaved of his dearest delight, and yet suffering joyfully the loss of all things,
bade them adieu, and went forth ‘not knowing whither he went.’
In the collection of Farewell Sermons there are three by Mr Watson, viz.: two delivered August
17th, and the third on the Tuesday following. The first, preached in the forenoon, is on John 13:34.
‘A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another.’ It discovers much of the spirit
of the gospel, particularly in recommending love to enemies and persecutors. The second, preached
in the afternoon, is on 2 Corinthians 7:7. ‘Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us
cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.’
In the former part of it, he insists largely on ‘the ardent affections of a right gospel minister towards
his people.’ This head he closes thus: ‘I have now exercised my ministry among you for almost
sixteen years; and I rejoice and bless God that I cannot say, the more I love you, the less I am loved:
I have received many signal demonstrations of love from you. Though other parishes have exceeded
you in number of houses, yet, I think, none for strength of affection. I have with much comfort
observed your reverent attention to the word preached; you rejoice in this light, not for a season, but to this day. I have observed your zeal against error in a critical time, your unity and amity. This
is your honour. If there should be any interruption in my ministry among you, though I should not
be permitted to preach to you again, yet I shall not cease to love you, and to pray for you. But why
should there be any interruption made? Where is the crime? Some, indeed, say that we are disloyal
and seditious. Beloved, what my actions and sufferings for his Majesty have been is known to not
a few of you. However, we must go to heaven through good report and bad report; and it is well if
we can get to glory, though we press through the pikes. I shall endeavour that I may still approve
the sincerity of my love to you. I will not promise that I shall still preach among you, nor will I say
that I shall not. I desire to be guided by the silver thread of God’s word and providence. My heart
is towards you. There is, you know, an expression in the late Act, “that we shall now shortly be as
if we were naturally dead;’’ and if I must die, let me leave some legacy with you. Then follow
twenty admirable directions, well worthy the fervent perusal of every Christian. He closes them
thus: ‘I beseech you treasure them up as so many jewels in the cabinet of your breasts. Did you
carry them about you, they would be an antidote to keep you from sin, and a means to preserve the
zeal of piety flaming upon the altar of your hearts. I have many things yet to say to you, but I know
not whether God will give another opportunity. My strength is now almost gone. I beseech you,
let these things make deep impressions on all your souls. Consider what has been said, and the Lord
give you understanding in all things.’
The last discourse, August 19th, is on Isaiah 3:30, 11. ‘Say ye t0 the righteous, that it shall be
well with him: for they shall eat the fruit of their doings. Woe unto the wicked! it shall be ill with
him, for the reward of his hands shall be given him.’
After his ejectment, Watson preached occasionally whenever he could do so with safety. Fines
and imprisonments were insufficient to close the mouths of the witnesses of Jesus. In barns, kitchens,
outhouses, or dells and woods, the faithful few gathered to hear the message of eternal life. Those
little secret assemblies were doubtless charming occasions for devout minds: the word of the Lord
was precious in those days. Bread eaten in secret is proverbially sweet, and the word of God in
persecution is peculiarly delightful. Little can we realise the joyful anticipation which preceded the
appointed meetings, or the lingering memories which clung to them long after they were over. After
the great fire in 1666, when the churches were burned, Mr Watson and several other Nonconformists
fitted up large rooms for those who had an inclination to attend. Upon the Indulgence, in 1672, he
licensed the great hall in Crosby House, on the east side of Bishopsgatestreet, then belonging to
Sir John Langham (a Nonconformist). It was a happy circumstance that the worthy baronet favoured
the cause of Nonconformity, and that so noble a chamber was at his disposal. Here Watson preached
for several years. Rev Stephen Charnock, B.D.’ became joint pastor with him at Crosby Hall in
1675, and continued so till his death in 1680. What two shepherds for the flock! Men of such most
extraordinary gifts and graces were seldom if ever united in one pastorate. They both attempted a
Body of Divinity, and the goodly volume on the Divine Attributes was Charnock’s first stone of a
colossal structure which he was not spared to complete. Our author was more modest in his attempt
and the present volume shows how he succeeded.
Mr Watson at length returned to Essex, where he died suddenly, in his closet at prayer, as is
supposed, about 1689 or 1690. The time either of his birth or death is nowhere mentioned.
In the life of Colonel James Gardiner, there is this remarkable account: ‘In July, 1719, he had
spent the evening, which was the Sabbath, in some gay company, and had an unhappy assignation
with a married lady, whom he was to attend exactly at twelve. The company broke up about eleven, and he went into his chamber to kill the tedious hour. It happened that he took up a religious book,
which his good mother or aunt had, without his knowledge, slipped into his portmanteau, called,
“The Christian Soldier,†written by Mr Watson. Guessing by the title that he should find some
phrases of his own profession spiritualised in a manner which might afford him some diversion,
he resolved to dip into it: while this book was in his hand, an impression was made upon his mind,
which drew after it a train of the most important consequences. Suddenly he thought he saw an
unusual blaze of light fall on the book while he was reading, and lifting up his eyes, he apprehended,
to his extreme amazement, that there was before him, as it were suspended in the air, a visible
representation of the Lord Jesus Christ upon the cross, surrounded with a glory, and was impressed
as if a voice had come to him, to this effect: “O sinner, did I suffer this for thee, and are these thy
returns?†He sunk down in his chair, and continued for some time insensible. He then arose in a
tumult of passions, and walked to and fro in his chamber, till he was ready to drop, in unutterable
astonishment and agony of heart, which continued until the October following, when his terrors
were turned into unutterable joy.’
Mr Watson published a variety of books upon practical subjects, and of a useful nature. But his principal work was a body of divinity, in one hundred and
seventy-six sermons, upon the Westminster Assembly’s Catechism, which did not appear till after his death. It
was published in one volume folio, in 1692, and accompanied with a portrait of the author, by Sturt;
together with a recommendatory preface by the Rev William Lorimer, and the attestation of
twenty-five other ministers of principal note in that day. For many a year this volume continued to
train the common people in theology, and it may still be found very commonly in the cottages of
the Scottish peasantry.
The following are the titles of the principal works of Thomas Watson: viz. Three treatises: 1.
‘The Christian’s Charter.’ 2. ‘The Art of Divine Contentment.’ 3. ‘A Discourse of Meditation,’ to which is added several sermons, 1660. This volume contains, besides the three treatises, the
following, viz.: ‘God’s Anatomy upon Man’s Heart,’ ‘The Saint’s Delight,’ ‘A Christian on Earth
still in Heaven,’ ‘Christ’s Loveliness,’ ‘The Upright Man’s Character and Crown,’ ‘The One Thing
Necessary,’ ‘The Holy Longing; or, the Saint’s Desire to be with Christ,’ ‘Beatitudes; or, a Discourse
upon part of Christ’s Famous Sermon upon the Mount,’ 1660, ‘A Body of Practical Divinity,’ etc.’
with a supplement of some sermons, ‘A Divine Cordial,†The Holy Eucharist,’ ‘Heaven taken by
Storm.
C.H. Spurgeon