Michelle My Bell profile picture

Michelle My Bell

About Me

WWW.MMMBELLAIMAGERY.COMThe reason why I refuse to take existentialism as just another French fashion or historical curiosity is that I think it has something very important to offer us for the new century. I’m afraid we’re losing the real virtues of living life passionately, in the sense of taking responsibility for who you are, the ability to make something of yourself and feeling good about life. Existentialism is often discussed as if it’s a philosophy of despair. But I think the truth is just the opposite. Sartre once interviewed said he never really felt a day of despair in his life. But one thing that comes out from reading these guys is not a sense of anguish about life so much as a real kind of exuberance of feeling on top of it. It’s like your life is yours to create. I’ve read the post modernists with some interest, even admiration. But when I read them, I always have this awful nagging feeling that something absolutely essential is getting left out. The more that you talk about a person as a social construction or as a confluence of forces or as fragmented or marginalized, what you do is you open up a whole new world of excuses. And when Sartre talks about responsibility, he’s not talking about something abstract. He’s not talking about the kind of self or soul that theologians would argue about. It’s something very concrete. It’s you and I talking. Making decisions. Doing things take the consequences. It might be true that there are six billion people in the world and counting. Nevertheless, what you do makes a difference. It makes a difference, first of all in material terms. Makes a difference to other people and it sets an example. And in short, I think the message here is that we should never simply write ourselves off and see ourselves as the victim of various forces. It’s always our decision who we are.
CLICK HERE to get a FREE MYSPACE LAYOUT OR create your own using MYSPACE PROFILE EDITOR !!!

My Interests

I'd like to meet:

Creation seems to come out of imperfection. It seems to come out of a striving and a frustration. And this where I think language came from. I mean, it came from our desire to transcend our isolation and have some sort of connection with on another. And it had to be easy when it was just simple survival. Like, you know, “water.” We came up with a sound for that. Or, “Saber-toothed tiger right behind you.” We came up with a sound for that. But when it gets really interesting, I think, is when we use that same system of symbols to communicate all the abstract and intangible things that we’re experiencing. What is, like, frustration? Or what is anger or love? When I say “love,” the sound comes out of my mouth and it hits the other person’s ear, travels through this Byzantine conduit in their brain, you know through their memories of love or lack of love, and they register what I’m saying and say yes, they understand. But how do I know they understand? Because worlds are inert. They’re just symbols. They’re dead, you know? And so much of our experience is intangible.So much of what we perceive cannot be expressed. It’s unspeakable. And yet, you know, when we communicate with one another, and we—we feel that we have connected, and we think we’re understood, I think we have a feeling of almost spiritual communion. And that feeling might be transient, but I think it’s what we live for.