I'm a burgeoning 9/11 conspiracy theorist wacko . This site is my personal exploration into the events surrounding 9/11 and beyond.
I have no specific agenda I'm pursuing other than to dredge up facts. I'm simply interested in finding the truth.
I've found a massive, ever-increasing body of evidence suggesting that there was far more going .., during, and after the attacks than what we were led to believe.
If you don't think the Bush administration is capable of abusing power, read this statement by then Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle. Also read this report by the US-based Institute for Policy Studies.
If you don't think US agencies are capable and willing to carry out morally questionable operations, read this or try the video.
If you think Usama Bin Laden is to blame, why doesn't the FBI list 9/11 on his rap sheet ? Is it because there is no hard evidence that Bin Laden was behind the attacks?
Considering al-Qaeda seems to desire publicity and had issued fatwas - as early as 1996 - declaring war against the US and its allies, isn't it odd CNN reported that Bin Laden denied involvement six days after the attacks?
If you think we're in Iraq to punish the 9/11 culprits, then you REALLY need to see this and this .
Even the Pentagon now says that Iraq and Al-Qaeda are not linked.
Well, apparently Bush no longer spends much time on Bin Laden anyway.
And for those of you who don't know why we're in Iraq, it's perfectly clear. Bush has eloquently stated that we attacked Iraq because we thought they had WMDs... but now we're there to advance a "freedom agenda"... and because they hate us and have no hope and that makes a breeding ground for "suiciders"... and to defeat resentment... and to give the Iraqis hope by giving them a government ... and to reduce human suffering...and change the Middle East... err...uhhh...
One thing I'd really like to know is what could have been cooking away at 1500 degrees under the rubble of the WTC towers over a month and a half after the collapse. I'm thinking computers and jet fuel are not it. The leading official theory now is that heat did not melt the steel, but weakened it enough for the weight above to crush the towers. So what could have been causing the inferno 6 weeks afterwards?
I post what I find here in order to inform as many people as possible as to these inconsistencies. I understand that it is devastatingly hard to imagine that our government could have anything to do with the attacks, but try to stay open-minded to any possibilities. I, too, will try to gather pertinent evidence on all sides.
Another focus of this site is the impending end to the age of oil, it's ramifications to society, and the idea that it's a possible motivation behind the alleged 9/11 conspiracy.
Please explore the links I've compiled and decide for yourself. Also if you find anything interesting that I've left out or overlooked, please let me know.
A small selection of interesting tidbits for you to ponder:
Steel framed, fire protected 7 World Trade Center (7WTC) collapsed on Sept. 11 with non-jet fuel fires on a couple of floors [yes, a third building collapsed - not one of the twin towers, but near them - the one no one ever talks about]. Here's a pic to help see why it's a little strange. ZOINKS! Imagine if a 47-story steel building near you collapsed from fire on a few floors!Here's an interesting BBC live broadcast where the reporter and reader board say 7WTC (Saloman Bldg.) has collapsed... and yet it is still standing behind her. It wouldn't fall for another 15 minutes. [Compare shots with 'pull it' vid.] DOH!
Listed 7WTC tenants included the Department of Defense, the CIA, the Office of Emergency Management, and the U.S. Secret Service.
The Northeastern division of NORAD ran pre-planned military excercises involving hypothetical hijacked planes on 9/11.
For six years until June 2000, George W. Bush's brother Marvin sat on the board of directors of Securacom (Stratesec) which ran security at Dulles Int'l Airport (where Flight 77 left before 'officially' hitting the Pentagon)as well as the WTC.
Many people reported hearing (and some were apparently harmed by) multiple explosions, some on the ground floors, before the towers collapsed.
All evidence of this mass murder was cleaned up and disposed of before any analysis of the crime site, and the Bush Administration worked very hard to limit the investigation . What did they have to hide?
Controlled Demolition did the clean up of the collapsed towers.
6 weeks after the collapse, molten metal was still present below the rubble.
The 9/11 Commission Report omits the fact that there were 47 massive central steel columns supporting the towers which should have remained standing after the "pancake collapse".
The 9/11 Commission fails to mention the collapse of 7WTC altogether.
By the way, according to Senator Max Cleland , the 9/11 Commission Report is "a scam... absolutely disgusting". After being appointed to the 9/11 commission, he resigned because of the information blockade put up by the Bush administration.
1WTC, 2WTC, 7WTC all fell at virtually freefall speed, even though the 9/11 commission says each floor of 1&2WTC pancaked on top of the next. Like a cue ball hitting the 8-ball, some of the energy of motion must be changed into energy used to break the level underneath - causing slowing of the collapse... unless the lower level is already broken.
MY RESEARCH:
Fantastic and well done video with wide spectrum of 9/11 explanation problems. Great new footage and interviews that help explain what was really happening. A must see. [90 min.] Full Alex Jones vid [156 min.] FEMA report section about unusual erosion patterns observed in the WTC debris. "The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 [from WTC 7] and 2 [from WTC 1 or 2] are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified… It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure." [Document] Military grade Thermite contains sulfur. [Wikipedia Site] Here's some news footage of the Flight 93 crash site... with very little wreckage. Longer vid with experts talking about major problems with 9/11 happenings - some good footage. [60 min.] MIT Engineer explains collapse incongruities. [15 min.] Vid on molten steel at ground zero a month and a half after collapse. [34 sec.] Wicked Thermite Demo (4532 Degrees Fahrenheit)! [4 min.] Great Vid on 9/11 inconsistencies(Alex Jones) [18 min.] Larry Silverstein (Became Owner of WTC complex 2 Months Prior to 9/11) says "pull it" (7WTC) on PBS(listen to the clip of him saying it and also the next one). [1 min.] Official FEMA Report says fire (although even FEMA says it's unlikely) took 7WTC down. "The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." [Document] Funny/Serious Vid on why we're REALLY in Iraq. Very entertaining. [46 min.] What was Dick Cheney doing on 9/11? More 9/11 inconsistencies. [29 min.] More interesting video/analysis. [Site w/ vids, links] Presentation on massive ommissions/distortions by 9/11 Commission. [33 min.] Another site devoted to debunking 9/11. Some good evidence reguarding the Pentagon attack. [Site w/ links] Are you ready to take the red pill? [101 min.] Apparently Bush didn't want a thorough investigation. [CNN article] Good Dutch vid production on 9-11 problems. Starring Former UK Government Minister Michael Meacher and Andreas Von Bulow, Former German Secretary Of Defense. [24 min.] Flight Data Recorders article: "FDRs are usually located in the... tail [so the]... front of the aircraft acts... to reduce the shock that reaches the recorder. [They] are typically double wrapped, in strong corrosion-resistant stainless steel or titanium, with high-temperature insulation inside. ...most modern units are self-ejecting... and equipped with radio and sonar beacons (i.e. emergency locator transmitter)." Apparently none of these were found at the WTC.According to the 9/11 Commission report (p.456): "The CVRs [cockpit voice recorder] and FDRs from American 11 and United 175 were not found, and the CVR from American Flight 77 was badly burned and not recoverable."
Note that there is NO mention of the FDR from flight 77.
MSNBC Article on finding TWO black boxes for Flight 77: "Then they saw two odd-shaped dark boxes, about 1.5 by 2 feet long. They’d been told the plane’s “black boxes†would in fact be bright orange, but these were charred black. The boxes had handles on one end and one was torn open. They cordoned off the area and called for an FBI agent, who in turn called for someone from the National Transportation Safety Board who confirmed the find: the black boxes from American Airlines Flight 77." CBS News story on black boxes: " 'It's extremely rare that we don't get the recorders back. I can't recall another domestic case in which we did not recover the recorders,' said Ted Lopatkiewicz, spokesman for the National Transportation Safety Board. The size of a shoe box and painted bright orange, the recorders are built to withstand fire, water and blunt-force impact, and are located in the tail for maximum protection. The four recorders from the other two hijacked planes - American Airlines Flight 77, which was flown into the Pentagon, and United Flight 93, which crashed near Somerset, Pa. - were recovered within days. FBI Director Robert Mueller said Flight 77's data recorder provided altitude, speed, headings and other information, but the voice recorder contained nothing useful."
[So here we have the FBI director saying they had a functioning FDR from flight 77. Why doesn't the 9-11 commission mention anything about it? Didn't they conduct a FULL investigation? And "nothing useful" on the CVR? Does he mean it was 'unreadable' as suggested by the 9-11 commission? Or was it readable and he just didn't think we would like to know what was said in the cockpit?]