Here is the official site for the page: http://www.myspace.com/americasfinestshow. Feel free to ask to be our friend; please highlight it, copy it, then paste it in the website your going to, then ADD Robert, B-man (Co-host) and I AS FRIENDS.
In short, we are the PEOPLE'S SHOW. To introduce ourselves, we are Jeff Crow, B-man and Robert Stark, your captains of this TRULY "American Political Ship". We are both experts at political/news commentary and have continually received high praise from people from all political persuasions due to our adherence to the Constitution, even when it isn't popular to do so.
We tend to attract the younger demographic of voters that have been engaged by Barack Obama, Ron Paul, Sarah Palin and others. But we also have a VERY STRONG base with more mature folks too because "Constitutionalism" is a form of "traditionalism". Except were smarter than them...LOL.
Because we have a mix of views, ALL BASED on the Constitutional Freedoms Americans are supposed to be afforded, it is difficult to "pigeon-hold" us into any one category of "political thought".
In fact, if you saw the different groups we've been put in by our friends, you'll find CONTRADICTORY groups...but in a way, we LIKE THAT!
Currently, we're working on a book that will essentially be a "political-how-to-manual" for success in making political arguments, how to approach certain demographic groups, etc., and as such, how to have success in politics. Both of us, Jazz in particular, have already been part of sucessful political campaigns in CALIFORNIA and know the secrets to unlocking success in politics. We'll let you know more about it as it develops.
This is a Constition-based, freedom-based show and its our opinions', that AMERICA IS LARGE ENOUGH FOR LIBERAL-leaning, CONSERVATIVE-leaning, LIBERTARIAN, etc. folks AND AREAS of the COUNTRY to be THEMSELVES by simply LIMITING "One-Size-Fits-All" Policies that emanate from our Federal Government.
In SHORT, we can all BE OURSELVES, so as long as we don't use GOVT to enforce our will on others and others don't do it to us...sounds reasonable enough, wouldn't you say???
It amazes us how many people want to truly boss others around. But it also amazes us how much freedom different types of folks want, and they can have it, IF we all agree to NOT try to run the lives of others. We are very open-minded.
Thus far we've interviewed everyone from Anti-Illegal Alien Activist and LA Homeless Activist from South Central LA (who ran one of the most successful homeless programs in LA called "The Dome"), Ted Hayes, to "The Prince of Pot" (as the DEA and the media has called him), Marc Emery, who the DEA claims is responsible for $2.2 Billion Dollars worth of "seed sales" that ultimately grew into that much money's worth of high-grade marijuana, he is currently fighting extradition from Canada. So as you can see, we accept everyone's views and strive to bring interesting guests for our viewers.
IF YOU ARE A MUSICIAN, in a ROCK BAND, RAP GROUP, etc. and would like to get some exposure on the show, we'd PREFER to use up and coming talent for the show music (theme music and "bumper music"), so let us know if you're interested in exposure in not only the California-Los Angeles Market, but World-Wide.
IF YOU HAVE AN AREA OF EXPERTISE in NEWS/POLITICS, ENTERTAINMENT/CULTURE NEWS, etc. OR operate an organization, have a blog or work in these areas, you may REQUEST to appear on the show for an interview from your location OR at the studios in CALIFORNIA. We also will allow individuals who watch the show to appear for debating, asking questions about topics, etc. Just write in to us and if we think you're smart enough and have some good arguments or can make some good points, then we'll let you on. Hit us up on myspace! Unlike talk radio or cable news, newspapers, etc., we want our audience to be able to interact with us in a meaningful manner (no pithy emails that don't allow you to explain your views like Cable News has, no censorship of your letters like the newspapers do and no being "cut-off" while you're making your point on talk radio). How many times have you watched some host on TV and just wanted to put him/her in their place....or wanted to vehemently express your agreement with him/her? With our show you will be able to. We also welcome all suggestions for topics and guests!
Hit us up with suggestions.
As stated before, our basic underlying belief is in the Constitution. We believe in the freedom of all Americans to be themselves with as little interference from Government as possible.
We believe in local people having the most say in what values and laws will exist in their communities, that way, activities acceptable in certain areas may not be in another; and Americans will naturally migrate to the areas that most represent their values. After all, what is acceptable in San Francisco CA may not be acceptable in Orange County CA.
Although we permit freedoms and individualism, some of which we may not personally engage in OR EVEN LIKE FOR THAT MATTER, we're not particularly interested in watching other people engage in these activities. Therefore I believe that at a minimum, respect (by the public and the individual(s) doing the activity) for PRIVACY should be the highest concern. That way, we can all be free without interfering with each others rights in public.
DO NOT ASSUME that just because we advocate for lots of freedoms that we participate in these activities. Quite frankly, some of the freedoms we would allow (well at least keeping the Federal Government out of the issue) are abhorrent to us! But the Constitution allows us to have differences, whether we like what someone else is doing or not. The Declaration of Independence also grants all citizens to the right of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness". In a free society, it should be up to the individual to decide for themselves what defines happiness to them. For some it might be target shooting, for others it might be reading the Bible or sports, while others smoke or gamble, do drugs, play video games, etc. So as long as one isn't infringing upon others, Government shouldn't be involved. Too many Americans have died in order to preserve our freedoms (over the years on multiple battle fronts) for our country to allow itself to legislate away freedoms, privileges and rights. BUSH ALREADY DID THIS TOO SOME EXTENT with his QASI-FASCISM, IF OBAMA IS SMART, HE WON'T DO THE SAME WITH QASI-SOCIALISM...
Our general views are that our nation needs to end illegal immigration, protect our borders, stop the "North American Union" and trade deals that hurt the average American worker, return abortion policy back to the states, end the Federal Drug War, aka "Federal Prohibition" by returning the enforcement of drug laws back to the States (then transfer all DEA personnel into Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the US Border Patrol), end Federal Gun Laws by returning them to the States (then transfer ATF personnel over to the same agencies as the DEA, along with sending some over to the FBI), with draw us from the Middle East through oil independence and focus on keeping them out of our country so that they can't attack us here and return our country back to its ORIGINALIST Constitution. The recent trend of mass-shootings by nut-cases proves that the police CAN NOT protect you from those bent on random mass murder. At this point, we need to open up concealed weapons permits to more Americans, even if ONLY 10% of Americans carried guns (after thorough back ground checks, etc.) we'd have around 28 million law abiding citizens who could potentially be in the zone a mass killer chooses and possibly stop the madman, or at least buy more time for more people to escape and thus save lives. Aside from that, these laws don't work anyways. Gun "control" laws only make the gun situation worse because they push the business underground like with drugs, prostitution, gambling, etc. and instead of well-regulated stores selling guns after back ground checks, you have criminals selling guns to anyone with the money.
We should also leave the United Nations unless they become a simple place where issues between two or more countries can be dealt with instead of the "wanna-be" "One World Government" it seeks to be. Here's an example of the stupid "One World Government" things they've done.
Back in 1975, the UN DECLARED that by the year 2000 the WORLD WOULD BE "DRUG-FREE"....well building upon that clear success, they want to DECLARE a "TOBACCO-FREE" and "SMALL-ARMS-FREE" World....in direct violation of our Constitution and our freedoms. Do you really want the UN to take away our Constitution or having the ability to boss us around?Invasion of America: Aztlan Map
NOTE: We DID NOT CREATE this map, MECHA and other La Raza anti-American "Mestizo Supremacists" made this map. We're merely showing what they want to see happen to America. This map was originally intended to "rally the brown-pride troops"....the people it should rally are those of us (of all ethnic backgrounds) who will be there and are brave enough to fight off this invasion by any means necessary.
Illegal immigration to the US is a direct threat to our culture, our internal security (OVER 45,000 Americans have been killed by illegal aliens since 9-11) and most importantly to our future. IT ALSO DESTROYS SMALL TOWN MEXICO and DESTROYS the TAX BASE of their ECONOMY.
We would institute a "Canadian-modeled-syle" Guest Worker Program, which seems to be satisfactory to both the workers and Canadian Tax Payers and keeps small town Mexico in tact, and keeps it thriving. Mexico can't continue "down a path" of where its most adverturous citizens leave and take the income they earn and spend with them....There is something much bigger at stake here, the coming "North American Union".
By blurring our borders by not enforcing these laws, it only feeds into the belief that the US, Mexico and Canada should BE a BORDER LESS unit called the NORTH AMERICAN UNION (NAU). The NAU is BAD FOR ALL THREE COUNTRIES! I've got news for you, there ALREADY IS an (NAU), its called the 50 states that make up the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!There is no need for a Federal-based war against drugs and it has been given a chance and has proven for years now to be a failure, as Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Littleton, CO), Rep. Ron Paul (R-Victoria, TX) and others have said. The CONSTITUTIONAL way to deal with the drug issue is: it should be left to the States, and instead of sending billions of tax dollars per year in drug prohibition related "WELFARE PAYMENTS" to Mexico, Colombia, etc. in the hopes they'll "stop" drugs from entering the US, that money should go to the States for local law enforcement for use to keep their areas under control.
Then take the entire DEA (and ATF) and shift them over to immigration enforcement, which will also enable us to increase the size of the Border Patrol literally overnight with out having to pay for one more new Government Agent, training, etc. Think about it, who knows the drug situation on the streets of their city, the cop that patrols it everyday, or a DEA Bureaucrat in DC (one of the most drug-ridden cities there is)? We all know the answer.
Join ex-cops and current ones, ex-DEA Agents, ex-FBI Agents, ex-prosecutors, judges, ex-prison guards and others who have ACTUALLY fought the drug war, who are against drug prohibition, by supporting L.E.A.P. (Law Enforcement Against Prohibition). Click on the link below to learn more about them.
We hold the Constitutionalist views of our Founding Fathers, Great Presidents and Reformers in our nation's history. Especially the first Republican President, Abe Lincoln, he was a very open-minded President in terms of personal freedom.
He once opined, "prohibition laws strike at the very heart of what it means to be a free American in that it seeks to legislate a man's (or woman's) appetite, and creates crimes out of things that are not inherently crimes." Prohibition laws he was talking about include: drug laws, prostitution laws (Lincoln legalized prostitution and regulated it in the conquered South, by doing so he dropped the "V.D" rates in the Union Army to a fraction by forcing the use of condoms, health checks for the girls and other regulations). He would also be against anti-gambling laws, gun-prohibition laws and more. The pictures on this page represent freedom, and the America Abe Lincoln (and the original Republican Party), would have wanted in today's world.
If the Republicans (or Democrats) return to the traditionalist states-rights model of dealing with these issues rather than the modern-day "paternalistic-socialistic" "Federalization" of "vice crime", either party will be a winning party (if they stay true on some other issues addressed on this page, especially illegal immigration) for a long time to come. Government needs to STOP these ridiculous laws which legislate our lives and stick to ACTUAL Constitution mandated programs such as: immigration enforcement, ensuring States properly protect their citizens through the use of the 14th Amendment, winning wars and protecting us against terrorists from within and world-wide, etc. Government (at all levels) MUST be limited to their Constitutional mandates. America can one day be a "truly free land again", we as the citizens of this country must make it happen though. We are
Social Libertarians
(70% permissive)
and...
Economic Conservatives
(76% permissive)
We are best described as:
CONSTITUTIONALISTS
Myspace Layouts at Pimp-My-Profile.com / SOUTHERN CA